2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-79228-4_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Maximal Matching Is NP-Hard in Regular Bipartite Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yannakakis and Gavril [18] then showed that EDS remains NP-hard when restricted to planar or bipartite graphs of maximum degree 3, and gave a polynomial-time algorithm for MMM in trees. Additional hard and polynomially solvable classes of graphs were then given by Horton et al [13], and much more recently by Demange and Ekim [6]. A fundamental inapproximability result was given by Chlebìk and Chlebìkovà [5], who showed that it is NP-Hard to approximate EDS (and hence also MMM) within any factor better than 7/6.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Yannakakis and Gavril [18] then showed that EDS remains NP-hard when restricted to planar or bipartite graphs of maximum degree 3, and gave a polynomial-time algorithm for MMM in trees. Additional hard and polynomially solvable classes of graphs were then given by Horton et al [13], and much more recently by Demange and Ekim [6]. A fundamental inapproximability result was given by Chlebìk and Chlebìkovà [5], who showed that it is NP-Hard to approximate EDS (and hence also MMM) within any factor better than 7/6.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Then, one can solve MWMM on G c by considering the graph G w where the weights on vertices satisfy the above condition and by solving MVWMM on G w as described in Remark 1. Note that in this situation the t-variable and optimality cuts (13) are no longer needed because any perfect matching in subgraph G[ŷ] has the same total weight (equal to the sum of the weights of saturated vertices), which is already minimized by the objective function (8). On the other hand, if no set of vertex weights satisfies the above condition, then one cannot transform MWMM on G c to an equivalent MVWMM instance.…”
Section: Using Mvwmm In the Solution Procedures For Mwmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the problem of finding a maximum matching on a given graph is polynomially solvable by Edmonds's augmenting path algorithm [11], MMM is NP-hard on general graphs [15] and on several restricted graph classes. Examples include bipartite or planar graphs with maximum degree 3 [33], planar bipartite graphs, planar cubic graphs [17], and k-regular bipartite graphs for any fixed k ≥ 3 [8]. In contrast, MMM is polynomially solvable in certain restricted graph classes.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMM problem is in general NP-hard [4] and therefore the MWMM problem is in general NP-hard as well, whereas the problems of finding a minimum/maximum weighted matching or minimum/maximum weighted perfect matching are all solvable in polynomial time, see, e.g., [5]. In particular, the MMM problem has been shown to be NP-hard in bipartite graphs with maximum degree 3 [4], planar cubic graphs [6], and -regular bipartite graphs for any ≥ 3 [7]. On the positive side, it has been shown that the MMM problem can be solved in polynomial time in some classes of graphs including trees [8], series-parallel graphs [9], and block graphs [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yannakakis and Gavril provide such an application in a telephone switching network in [4]. For other applications of the MWMM, the reader is referred to [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%