2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing biases associated with tracking analysis of submicron particles in heterogeneous biological fluids

Abstract: Tracking the dynamic motion of individual nanoparticles or viruses offers quantitative insights into their real-time behavior and fate in different biological environments. Indeed, particle tracking is a powerful tool that has facilitated the development of drug carriers with enhanced penetration of mucus, brain tissues and other extracellular matrices. Nevertheless, heterogeneity is a hallmark of nanoparticle diffusion in such complex environments: identical particles can exhibit strongly hindered or unobstru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Videos (512x512, 16-bit image depth) were captured with MetaMorph imaging software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at a temporal resolution of 66.7 ms and spatial resolution of 10 nm (nominal pixel resolution 0.156 mm per pixel) for 20 s. Subpixel tracking resolution was obtained by determining the precise location of the particle centroid by light-intensity-weighted averaging of neighboring pixels. Trajectories were analyzed using "frame-by-frame" weighting [49] in which mean squared displacements (MSD) and effective diffusivities (Deff) are first calculated for individual particle traces. Averages and distributions are then calculated at each frame based on only the particles present in that frame before averaging across all frames in the movie.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Videos (512x512, 16-bit image depth) were captured with MetaMorph imaging software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at a temporal resolution of 66.7 ms and spatial resolution of 10 nm (nominal pixel resolution 0.156 mm per pixel) for 20 s. Subpixel tracking resolution was obtained by determining the precise location of the particle centroid by light-intensity-weighted averaging of neighboring pixels. Trajectories were analyzed using "frame-by-frame" weighting [49] in which mean squared displacements (MSD) and effective diffusivities (Deff) are first calculated for individual particle traces. Averages and distributions are then calculated at each frame based on only the particles present in that frame before averaging across all frames in the movie.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subpixel tracking resolution was obtained by determining the precise location of the particle centroid by light-intensity-weighted averaging of neighboring pixels. Trajectories were analyzed using “frame-by-frame” weighting 51 in which mean squared displacements (MSD) and effective diffusivities (D eff ) are first calculated for individual particle traces. Averages and distributions are then calculated at each frame based on only the particles present in that frame before averaging across all frames in the movie.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracking resolution was determined by tracking the displacements of particles immobilized with a strong adhesive, following a previously described method 19 . Particle trajectories were analyzed using MATLAB software as described previously 20 . Sub-pixel tracking resolution was achieved by determining the precise location of the particle centroid by light-intensity-weighted averaging of neighboring pixels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle trajectories were analyzed using a MATLAB version of open-source particle-tracking code, originally developed in IDL by Crocker and Hoffman 29 . We have adapted this code to analyze particle trajectories on a “frame-by-frame” basis, as described previously 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%