2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive surgery for pelviureteral junction obstruction in adults: A critical review of the options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endopyelotomy is based on the concept that healing of the incised ureter occurs in a nonobstructing fashion around an indwelling stent usually of standard size [20]. The difference between the 2 techniques was probably because the Acucise produces an endopyelotomy with a predetermined direction and length unlike rupture with the balloon that leads to a ureteral tear [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endopyelotomy is based on the concept that healing of the incised ureter occurs in a nonobstructing fashion around an indwelling stent usually of standard size [20]. The difference between the 2 techniques was probably because the Acucise produces an endopyelotomy with a predetermined direction and length unlike rupture with the balloon that leads to a ureteral tear [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is the most invasive therapeutic option available in endourology and must be reserved only for patients in which the Acucise endopyelotomy is not recommended (pelvis volumes of more than 70 mL, renal function of less than 30%, or who have a crossing vessel) [20,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available studies of antegrade endopyelotomy show success rates from 65 to 93%. 19 Outcomes could be improved with careful patient selection. It has been shown that patients with less advanced hydronephrosis (Grade II) have better antegrade endopyelotomy outcomes than more advanced cases do (Grade IV).…”
Section: The Endoscopic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reviews of the surgical management for UPJO, one of the criticisms leveled at laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been the absence of long-term follow up. 3,12 It will certainly be some years before any series of laparoscopic pyeloplasty matches the mean 10-year follow-up demonstrated by O'Reilly and colleagues 1 in their series of open pyeloplasties. Jarrett and coworkers 13 show that failures after laparoscopic pyeloplasty, however, tend to occur within the first year, and Davenport and colleagues 5 showed that the mean time to failure was 4.6 months (range 3-11 mos).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%