2016
DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Review of current developments and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions made by Neumann et al [1] is pertinent as the application of MIS in the treatment of IBD has expanded significantly and become standard practice due to its advantages over open surgery. However, it is important to appreciate the fact that not all cases of IBD are suitable for LCS, particularly complicated and recurrent CD and UC, where combination of open and LCS should be considered for achieving best outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The conclusions made by Neumann et al [1] is pertinent as the application of MIS in the treatment of IBD has expanded significantly and become standard practice due to its advantages over open surgery. However, it is important to appreciate the fact that not all cases of IBD are suitable for LCS, particularly complicated and recurrent CD and UC, where combination of open and LCS should be considered for achieving best outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TEMS: Minimally invasive techniques have been one of the major advancements in surgery in the last few decades, and are also one of the future trends. Such a technique has been almost routinely performed in colorectal resection irrespective of underlying diseases[ 38 ]. With the development of surgical instruments, endoscopic surgery is considered a feasible and minimally invasive approach that can facilitate better exposure, direct visualization and precise operation, with an increasing number of surgeons choosing it[ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high-volume centers, the majority of surgery in the elective setting is currently being performed using a minimally invasive approach [44]. There are many who advocate for laparoscopic or robotic approaches to these procedures, and much has been written on the advantages of a minimally invasive approach including less intraoperative blood loss, decreased LOS, faster return of bowel function, and improved 30-day outcomes [45][46][47]. A recent metaanalysis comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery in this setting was inconclusive, finding both to be safe, but that robotic procedures took longer to perform with a nonstatistical trend towards fewer complications [48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%