2009
Minimal Risk in Pediatric Research as a Function of Age
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
19
2
1
0
Citation Types
0
6
0
0
Year Published
2010
2021
Publication Types
Select...
14
7
1
Relationship
0
22
Authors
Journals
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 16 publications
0
6
0
0
“…According to Edwards (Edwards, 2012), minimal risk is commonly described as brief pain from a small abrasion or wound, injections, or from common medical procedures where the probability of harm is no more than one would encounter in daily life. Some researchers have concluded that the definition of low risk differs between a healthy population of study and a clinical population of study (Wendler, 2009). We note that the pressure pain youth experienced in our study was no more severe than that commonly induced during routine clinical examination, physiotherapy, and routine motions/tasks following surgery (i.e., moving from bed to toilet or bath).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Edwards (Edwards, 2012), minimal risk is commonly described as brief pain from a small abrasion or wound, injections, or from common medical procedures where the probability of harm is no more than one would encounter in daily life. Some researchers have concluded that the definition of low risk differs between a healthy population of study and a clinical population of study (Wendler, 2009). We note that the pressure pain youth experienced in our study was no more severe than that commonly induced during routine clinical examination, physiotherapy, and routine motions/tasks following surgery (i.e., moving from bed to toilet or bath).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…United States regulations limit non-therapeutic research that carries more than minimal risk (Wendler 2009). The current data are consistent with MRI being a minimal risk procedure, at least based on the psychological reactions to the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not clear whether the risks posed in CTIMPs are sufficiently and proportionately greater than those encountered in clinical practice to justify universal testing. It has been suggested that older children with decision-making capacity should be able to take part in research that bears greater risks than the minimal risk standard for younger children provided they understand it and agree to participate 14 15. Implementation of this proposal might enable them to forego pregnancy testing when there is a perceived low risk of the treatment to pregnancy or fetus.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
