2016
DOI: 10.1179/1945511915y.0000000003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity fugl–meyer assessment in chronic-stroke

Abstract: In chronic poststroke hemiparetic subjects, the computed MCID of FMA-LE is a score of 6. The subjects who achieve a change in a score of 6 on FMA-LE would perceive a meaningful recovery of lower-extremity function than those who do not. The reference value may be utilized in stroke rehabilitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
35
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…37 It is also greater than, or similar to, that reported in other treadmill training studies with and without BWS. Lower extremity impairment, as measured using the FM, also improved by >7 points and exceeded the threshold for a perceived meaningful recovery (6 points) by individuals with chronic stroke 38 and was greater than the 1.5-point improvement demonstrated in the only other BWS training study 34 reporting FM scores. Finally, the average improvement of 3.9 points in the motor domain of the FIM for our participants was also greater than the 1.7-point change seen in a previous BWS treadmill training study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…37 It is also greater than, or similar to, that reported in other treadmill training studies with and without BWS. Lower extremity impairment, as measured using the FM, also improved by >7 points and exceeded the threshold for a perceived meaningful recovery (6 points) by individuals with chronic stroke 38 and was greater than the 1.5-point improvement demonstrated in the only other BWS training study 34 reporting FM scores. Finally, the average improvement of 3.9 points in the motor domain of the FIM for our participants was also greater than the 1.7-point change seen in a previous BWS treadmill training study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The improvement of 10% is the minimum effect that has been previously considered to be of clinical significance [42] and the FMA and WMFT are highly recommended for measuring the outcomes of patients with stroke [46]. The reported minimal clinically important difference values for chronic patients were 6 for the lower-extremity FMA [47] and 1–1.2 for the WMFT functional score [48]. Therefore, our definition of improvement is beyond the result of chance or increasing familiarity with the test observed in chronic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The averaged value of 3 trials were used for data analysis. The lower extremity motor control was evaluated by FMA scale which has been reported with good reliability for stroke patients 46,47 . The total score of lower extremity part is 34, and higher score indicates better control of lower extremity.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%