2019
DOI: 10.3390/separations6020030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniaturized Matrix Solid-Phase Dispersion for the Analysis of Ultraviolet Filters and Other Cosmetic Ingredients in Personal Care Products

Abstract: A method based on micro-matrix solid-phase dispersion (μ-MSPD) followed by gas-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) was developed to analyze UV filters in personal care products. It is the first time that MSPD is employed to extract UV filters from cosmetics samples. This technique provides efficient and low-cost extractions, and allows performing extraction and clean-up in one step, which is one of their main advantages. The amount of sample employed was only 0.1 g and the extraction procedure w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The µMSPD procedure was adapted from that previously developed by the authors for the extraction of fragrances, UV filters, or preservatives from cosmetic and personal care products [ 9 , 26 , 27 ]. Briefly, 0.1 g of cosmetic samples were weighted into a 10 mL glass vial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The µMSPD procedure was adapted from that previously developed by the authors for the extraction of fragrances, UV filters, or preservatives from cosmetic and personal care products [ 9 , 26 , 27 ]. Briefly, 0.1 g of cosmetic samples were weighted into a 10 mL glass vial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, a miniaturization of the classical MSPD (μMSPD), employing disposable low-cost material and a low organic solvent consumption (1 mL) is proposed as a suitable sample preparation technique. μMSPD has been reported for the extraction of allowed cosmetic ingredients such as fragrances, dyes, or UV filters [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this miniaturized technique has never been applied for the determination of a broad range of banned or unexpected compounds in cosmetics and personal care products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the elution solvent, ethyl acetate showed the highest extraction efficiency for most of the target compounds before GC analysis [65,69,70,73,74], whereas MeOH was the preferred elution solvent for μ-MSPD extractions before LC analysis [66][67][68]. The use µ-MSPD was subsequently successfully applied for the determination of other cosmetic ingredients including dyes, fragrances, preservatives [66][67][68][69][70][71], as well as for the multianalyte determination of a high number of allowed and restricted ingredients, in addition to banned compounds such as glucocorticoids [72,73,75]. Recently, this miniaturized approach was also applied to extract impurities or unexpected compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), fungicides, nitrosamines, or alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs) from cosmetics formulations.…”
Section: Matrix Solid-phase Dispersion (Mspd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µ-MSPD was subsequently successfully applied for the determination of other cosmetic ingredients including dyes, fragrances, preservatives [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ], as well as for the multianalyte determination of a high number of allowed and restricted ingredients, in addition to banned compounds such as glucocorticoids [ 72 , 73 , 75 ]. Recently, this miniaturized approach was also applied to extract impurities or unexpected compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), fungicides, nitrosamines, or alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs) from cosmetics formulations.…”
Section: Sample Preparation Strategies For Cosmetics Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation