2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2766-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mini-open anterior approach to the cervicothoracic junction: a cadaveric study

Abstract: Purpose To investigate the feasibility of mini-open anterior approach to the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) in cadaveric specimens. Methods Four adult fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used for this study. On the cadaveric specimen, an osteotomy window was made in manubrium sterni to remove the bony obstacle. To bypass the vital vascular and neural structures over the operative field, we used the surgical corridor which was located medially by the brachiocephalic artery and laterally by the right brachioce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The entry angle indicates the angle between the sagittal pedicle axis and the vertical line exposure due to the bony obstructions of the thorax. In turn, it is associated with a relatively high risk of neurovascular injury within the thoracic outlet, infections, bone instability, and may even influence the function of the shoulder joint [26]. We suggest that the technology of ATPS in the CTJ be used in the following circumstances in particular: (1) patients who underwent anterior/anteroposterior approach surgery and need an anterior revision surgery; and (2) patients who have planned to have an anteroposterior approach surgery, which could be replaced by an anterior only approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entry angle indicates the angle between the sagittal pedicle axis and the vertical line exposure due to the bony obstructions of the thorax. In turn, it is associated with a relatively high risk of neurovascular injury within the thoracic outlet, infections, bone instability, and may even influence the function of the shoulder joint [26]. We suggest that the technology of ATPS in the CTJ be used in the following circumstances in particular: (1) patients who underwent anterior/anteroposterior approach surgery and need an anterior revision surgery; and (2) patients who have planned to have an anteroposterior approach surgery, which could be replaced by an anterior only approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true for commonly needed anterior approach lesions in the vertebral body. However, the kyphosis of the upper thoracic spine make the vertebral bodies hard to locate due to its depth, and the presence of neurovascular and osseous obstacles limit the surgical approach 6101115). To decrease the surgical risk, a thoracic surgeon may aid exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traditional anterior low cervical approach limits additional work field for procedures such as anterior plating, corpectomy because of the anterior bony structure. Previous authors have mentioned such problems 6). The sternal manubrium and clavicles often interrupt access to the upper thoracic level (T1–T3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CTJ or upper thoracic spine causes more strain on the post-fusional segment postoperatively because of the transition area from a mobile, lordortic cervical to a rigid, kyphotic thoracic spine. Since the midline full sternotomy was described by Cauchoix and Binnet in 1957, various modified approaches for CTJ lesions have been tried 1 3 4 5 7 8 10 12 13 14 16) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anterior approach enables direct decompression by removing the pathology and provides efficient stabilization without damaging the posterior element, but anterior surgical approach to the CTJ is still challenging due to the anatomical structure and complex regional biomechanics 11) . Although several methods are available to help the spine surgeon decide whether do perform a manubriotomy, some remain controversial 2 4 7 8 16) . We report on the technical feasibility and limitations of the transmanubrial approach for CTJ lesions and emphasize the advantage of bisecting the upper part of the manubrium in an inverted Y-shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%