2020
DOI: 10.15826/umj.2020.2.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Min-Max Solutions for Parametric Continuous Static Game Under Roughness (Parameters in the Cost Function and Feasible Region Is a Rough Set)

Abstract: Any simple perturbation in a part of the game whether in the cost function and/or conditions is a big problem because it will require a game re-solution to obtain the perturbed optimal solution. This is a waste of time because there are methods required several steps to obtain the optimal solution, then at the end we may find that there is no solution. Therefore, it was necessary to find a method to ensure that the game optimal solution exists in the case of a change in the game data. This is the aim of this p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…El Shafei [19] proposed a new formulation of large scale CSG and explained how they can solve the mentioned problem by the concept of PMS and in [20] suggested an interactive compromise programming for a kind of Cooperative CSG (CCSG). Kenneth et al [21] designated some methods for solving all solutions of polynomial systems and then using these compute the equilibrium manifold of a kind of CSG, see also [22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Shafei [19] proposed a new formulation of large scale CSG and explained how they can solve the mentioned problem by the concept of PMS and in [20] suggested an interactive compromise programming for a kind of Cooperative CSG (CCSG). Kenneth et al [21] designated some methods for solving all solutions of polynomial systems and then using these compute the equilibrium manifold of a kind of CSG, see also [22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%