2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk production in Holstein cows supplemented with different levels of ruminally protected methionine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
50
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lacking effect on milk fat percentage following RPM supplementation was reported earlier with dairy goats (Poljičak Milas & Marenjak 2007) and with dairy cows (Lara et al 2006, Třinácty et al 2006, Yang et al 2010, Soltan et al 2012. However, both (fat content and yield) were negatively affected by supplementation of RPM to early lactating dairy goats (Madsen et al 2005).…”
Section: Milk Yield and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lacking effect on milk fat percentage following RPM supplementation was reported earlier with dairy goats (Poljičak Milas & Marenjak 2007) and with dairy cows (Lara et al 2006, Třinácty et al 2006, Yang et al 2010, Soltan et al 2012. However, both (fat content and yield) were negatively affected by supplementation of RPM to early lactating dairy goats (Madsen et al 2005).…”
Section: Milk Yield and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Contrary to that, the inclusion of RPM in the diet of lactating ewes resulted in an increase of daily protein yield with no effect on milk protein content as a function of elevated milk yield (Goulas et al 2003). Those reported increased milk protein content attributed that to a major synthesis of casein and a reduction in urea nitrogen (Lara et al 2006).…”
Section: Milk Yield and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DMI and hence also consumption of nutrients were the lowest in the diet containing MetaSmart TM (18.96 kg; M) in contrast to the diet containing Smartamine TM M, for which DMI was the highest (20.48 kg; S; P < 0.001). Several previous studies have failed to show significant effects of Met supplementation on DMI (Lara et al, 2006;Phipps et al, 2008;Ordway et al, 2009). However, some studies reported decreased feed intake (Johnson et al, 1999), in contrast with the findings of Xu et al (1998), who observed an increase in DMI for cows supplemented with Lys and Met.…”
Section: Dry Matter Intake and Milk Productionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reviewed literature noted various and inconsistent responses in milk yields and milk composition. The addition of Met in a diet appeared to be the most effective during early lactation (Socha et al, 2005;Lara et al, 2006). In the current experiment, which used cows shifting from the first to the second lactation periods, the highest average milk yields were recorded for cows supplemented with MetaSmart TM (31.34 kg), which produced approximately by 1.14 kg (P < 0.001) and 0.78 kg (P < 0.01) more milk than cows fed diets C and S, respectively.…”
Section: Dry Matter Intake and Milk Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%