2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis – a biomechanical in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that it is possible to obtain optimal fixation of a short metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem without diaphyseal fixation in young patients and that there was no thigh pain and little stress shielding with this approach. On the basis of hip scores, this implant seems comparable to others [11,[35][36][37][38][41][42][43] but without a controlled trial, there is no way to know for sure [1,2,7,18,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. A potential concern with the use of short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless femoral components is whether stable fixation can be obtained without diaphyseal fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We showed that it is possible to obtain optimal fixation of a short metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem without diaphyseal fixation in young patients and that there was no thigh pain and little stress shielding with this approach. On the basis of hip scores, this implant seems comparable to others [11,[35][36][37][38][41][42][43] but without a controlled trial, there is no way to know for sure [1,2,7,18,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. A potential concern with the use of short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless femoral components is whether stable fixation can be obtained without diaphyseal fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosthesis stem migration occurred at a faster rate in the first half-year compared to the second one (4.72 vs 3.49), which may be attributable to partial resorption of the spongy bone compressed during implant bed preparation. An in vitro study demonstrated that a short stem implant became stable when it came in contact with cortical bone or in the setting of sufficient spongy bone compression [21]. The hydroxyapatite or calcium phosphate coating of the implant and its porous structure additionally improve the stability of prosthesis positioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mo żna to tłu ma czyć czę ścio wą re sorp cją, ubi tej w cza sie przy go to wy wa nia lo ży pod pro te zę ko ści gąb cza stej. Ba da nia in vi tro wy ka za ły, że implant krót ko trz pie nio wy sta je się sta bil ny w mo mencie, kie dy uzy ska ny zo sta nie kon takt z ko ścią ko ro wą lub doj dzie do wy star cza ją cej kom pre sji ko ści gąb -cza stej [21]. Po kry cie im plan tu hy drok sy apa ty tem/ fos fo ra nem wap nia wraz z je go po ro wa tą struk tu rą, dodat ko wo po pra wia ją sta bil ność osa dze nia en do pro te zy.…”
Section: Dys Ku Sjaunclassified
“…The new implant has been described as incorporating the design philosophy of the previous device, while enhancing the fixation surface and removing the superfluous distal stem [11]. The potential benefits of these modifications are welcome, and other authors have presented sound rationale and in vitro evidence for the new generation implant [11,13,14]. However, even theoretically sound design changes that received regulatory approval may occasionally be prone to unexpected adverse events that become apparent only after unrestricted clinical use, as illustrated by a number of recent examples including symptomatic taper corrosion and catastrophic modular neck failures [1,10].…”
Section: Where Do We Need To Go?mentioning
confidence: 99%