1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1806333.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migraine in Childhood and Adolescence. A Critical Study of the Diagnostic Criteria and of the Influence of Age on Clinical Findings

Abstract: ABSTRACT)*. THESIS. SÃO PAULO, 1998. JOSÉ LUIZ DIAS GHERPELLI **Two hundred and fifty-three children, aged < 15 years old, comprised the study group. The study was divided in 2 phases.Phase 1 included 193 children with migraine with and without aura (1.1 and 1.2) diagnosed according to the IHS criteria, with a mean age of 10,3 y., divided in 2 groups according to their age (< 10 or > 10 years). We studied the relationship between age and migraine type, headache characteristics and associated symptoms that are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
38
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(3 reference statements)
7
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The children attended a specialized headache clinic in Milan, where there is usually little selection of children with the more severe forms. They had a similar percentage of severe or moderate intensity to that described in another study of children with primary headaches with the same mean age, 4 although they had lower percentages of the characteristics typical for migraine. Few studies have analysed the use of the ICHD-II for classification of children with headaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The children attended a specialized headache clinic in Milan, where there is usually little selection of children with the more severe forms. They had a similar percentage of severe or moderate intensity to that described in another study of children with primary headaches with the same mean age, 4 although they had lower percentages of the characteristics typical for migraine. Few studies have analysed the use of the ICHD-II for classification of children with headaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The modification of the duration criterion, namely acceptance of 1-hour duration for MO (independently of corroboration by diary), as most authors suggest, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] resulted in the children in our study showing a statistically non-significant increase in the number with MO as a result of a decrease in the number with probable MO, compared with the results of the ICHD-II, but not in a decrease in unclassifiable children. Following the above-mentioned change for the duration criterion, other authors have reported an increase of migraine cases without making a distinction between MO and probable MO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No modification has been made for the number of earlier episodes (criterion A). Several authors have suggested a further shortening (12,13,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) or even exclusion (22,23) of the duration criterion for migraine in children. In addition, the requirement of five earlier episodes of migraine in a childhood population has been questioned (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly Metsahonkala ( 1994 ) reported that when duration was omitted as a criterion the prevalence of migraine increased by 25.9%. In fact Gherpelli and colleagues ( 1998 ) found that entirely excluding duration criterion increased the sensitivity without decreasing the specificity of pediatric migraine diagnosis. This study supports the suggestion of decreasing the criterion on the minimal duration of head pain to less than one hour for migraine without aura in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%