2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure–property relations of a steel powder metal under varying temperatures, strain rates, and stress states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All tests were performed on specimens machined from rectangular blanks compacted and sintered by Metaldyne, LLC at a sintered density of 6.35 g/cm^ and 7.05 g/cm^. A detailed explanation of the structure-property experimental procedure may be found in the publication by Allison et al [23].…”
Section: Experimental Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All tests were performed on specimens machined from rectangular blanks compacted and sintered by Metaldyne, LLC at a sintered density of 6.35 g/cm^ and 7.05 g/cm^. A detailed explanation of the structure-property experimental procedure may be found in the publication by Allison et al [23].…”
Section: Experimental Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture toughness, Kyz = 40 MPay^m was obtained from the literature [24]. However, the averages for initial pore radius, pore volume fraction, initial particle size, particle volume fraction, and grain size were determined from microstructural analysis as discussed previously in the manuscript by Allison et al [23]. From image analysis, we quantified the microstructural quantities and the damage parameters from examining the fracture surface of failed specimens and the data are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The load frame was equipped with a 50 KN load cell (± 0.4%) while a clip-on extensometer recorded the strain through fracture. Dynamic experiments ( ̇ ) were conducted on a Split-Hopkinson Tension Bar (SHTB) located at the Mississippi State University Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems (MSU-CAVS) as described in [21], [22]. For SHTB testing, the specimens were held by 350-margaging steel grips between 12.7 mm diameter 7075-T6 incident and transmission bars instrumented with semiconductor strain gages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code uses grayscale gradients to determine the significant properties such as particle size, nearest-neighbor distance, aspect ratio, and volume fraction. The experimental details of the image analysis procedures used can be found elsewhere [18] . The results of the image analyses of an undeformed specimen, a specimen tested at quasi-static strain rate, and a specimen tested at high strain rate help to establish the mechanisms responsible for failure.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%