2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3114419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstrip superconducting quantum interference device radio-frequency amplifier: Effects of negative feedback on input impedance

Abstract: We present the results of measurements of the scattering parameters of microstrip amplifiers ͑MSAs͒ based on the dc superconducting quantum interference device. The amplifier input impedance is poorly matched to typical transmission line impedances, resulting in high input return loss around Ϫ2 dB. We show that negative feedback can lower the MSA input impedance to achieve a robust match to 50 ⍀. In the presence of capacitive and inductive feedback, the input return loss of the MSA can be reduced below Ϫ10 dB,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are other implementations of directional amplifiers but they have so far met difficulties in satisfying all the aforementioned criteria. For example, SQUID-based directional amplifiers, such as the microstrip SQUID amplifier (MSA) [18][19][20] and the superconducting low-inductance undulatory galvanometer (SLUG) [21,22], dissipate energy on chip and have outof-band back-action which still requires using circulators in quantum measurements [23]. There is also a different type of directional amplifier known as the traveling-wave parametric amplifier in which the nonlinearity of kinetic inductance of superconducting transmission lines [24] or Josephson junctions [25] is exploited in order to parametrically amplify weak propagating signals.…”
Section: Plifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other implementations of directional amplifiers but they have so far met difficulties in satisfying all the aforementioned criteria. For example, SQUID-based directional amplifiers, such as the microstrip SQUID amplifier (MSA) [18][19][20] and the superconducting low-inductance undulatory galvanometer (SLUG) [21,22], dissipate energy on chip and have outof-band back-action which still requires using circulators in quantum measurements [23]. There is also a different type of directional amplifier known as the traveling-wave parametric amplifier in which the nonlinearity of kinetic inductance of superconducting transmission lines [24] or Josephson junctions [25] is exploited in order to parametrically amplify weak propagating signals.…”
Section: Plifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example of a superconducting nonreciprocal element is the microstrip SQUID amplifier (MSA) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The MSA is biased with a dc current and converts an ac flux signal at the input into an amplified voltage at the output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is difficult to avoid some kind of negative or positive feedback by the finite inductance of the bond wires used to connect the SQUID washer to ground, 11 we believe that at lower frequencies (300 MHz), this contribution to possible feedback can be made negligible. To this end, we were using seven very short ($1 mm) bond wires in parallel to connect the SQUID washer to ground.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their estimated stray inductance of $150 pH introduces an impedance of 0.3 X (at 300 MHz), which is negligible to the $50 X output impedance. We measured the noise temperature of a few MSAs first without, and then with external negative feedback 11 (gain reduced by 4 dB) but did not observe a noticeable difference in their noise temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation