2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastic ingestion in important commercial fish in the southern Caspian Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the total numbers of microplastics as well as microplastic abundance in the GIT and gills of A. persicus were higher than in C. aurata. However, the difference in microplastic abundance between these two species was not significant ( p > 0.05), which may be due to the feeding strategy of C. aurata , which feeds on detritus, benthic organisms, and even insects and planktons and subsequently ingests microplastics both from surface water and along with detritus (Zakeri et al, 2020), leading to the ingestion of more microplastics by this species. Similarly, Nematollahi et al (2021) and Zakeri et al (2020) reported higher abundance of microplastics in C. aurata compared with R. kutum and C. carpio in the Caspian Sea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the present study, the total numbers of microplastics as well as microplastic abundance in the GIT and gills of A. persicus were higher than in C. aurata. However, the difference in microplastic abundance between these two species was not significant ( p > 0.05), which may be due to the feeding strategy of C. aurata , which feeds on detritus, benthic organisms, and even insects and planktons and subsequently ingests microplastics both from surface water and along with detritus (Zakeri et al, 2020), leading to the ingestion of more microplastics by this species. Similarly, Nematollahi et al (2021) and Zakeri et al (2020) reported higher abundance of microplastics in C. aurata compared with R. kutum and C. carpio in the Caspian Sea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to previous studies (Harvey & Watts, 2018;Schwable et al, 2018), MPs have been found within human stools. These findings highlight that humans are exposed to MPs, and these particles can enter the human gut through the consumption of fish, bivalves, and crustaceans (Zakeri et al, 2020). This could result in the transport of not only MPs but also heavy metals to humans, affecting their immune systems and genetics (Brandts et al, 2018;Hwang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Mps In the Basinmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is an exponential increase in the number of studies looking at the presence of microplastics in marine and aquatic biota [17,19,57,59,60,81,83,89,102,[194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203]. Microplastics find their way into biota usually by ingestion (active uptake) [102,204,205] or adhesion, adsorption, or inhalation (passive uptake).…”
Section: Biotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of MP in the aquatic environment is often linked to the colossal quantity of plastic entering mainly from poorly managed plastic waste disposal [32,41,47,53,81,82]. The chronic exposure of MP in the aquatic environment poses various issues such as inducing inflammation, malnutrition, reproductive behavior and capacities [57,[83][84][85][86][87][88][89], and toxicity caused by the polymer used for manufacturing plastic products [60,[90][91][92][93]. The potential of MPs to adsorb hydrophobic contaminants due to their extremely large surface-to-volume ratio and long residence time in the water column [94,95] has attracted much attention in the scientific community [7,16,32,47,53,70,71,87,[96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%