2005
DOI: 10.3354/ame041181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microphytobenthic primary production in the Bodden estuaries, southern Baltic Sea, at two study sites differing in trophic status

Abstract: Eutrophication in coastal areas has stimulated phytoplankton growth, sustaining a high biomass and leading to a shift in the underwater light field. With the significance of the microphytobenthos for oxygen supply and carbon budget of both benthic and pelagic habitats in mind, the possible effects of reduced light availability were investigated in the estuarine Bodden area (southern Baltic Sea) at 2 sites differing in trophic status -the eutrophic Kirr Bucht (KB) and the mesotrophic Rassower Strom (RS). Using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microphytobenthos produce oxygen (Dalsgaard, 2003), fix large amounts of carbon (Gerbersdorf et al, 2005), drive benthic–pelagic nutrient exchanges (Ferguson et al, 2004), and provide trophic support (Sullivan and Moncreiff, 1990). Microphytobenthic communities are diverse at the species and group levels (Sullivan, 1978; Cahoon, 1999), but are often treated as a “black box,” where benthic microalgae are considered as a whole and the characteristics of individual key groups such as diatoms, green algae, and cyanobacteria are not evaluated individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microphytobenthos produce oxygen (Dalsgaard, 2003), fix large amounts of carbon (Gerbersdorf et al, 2005), drive benthic–pelagic nutrient exchanges (Ferguson et al, 2004), and provide trophic support (Sullivan and Moncreiff, 1990). Microphytobenthic communities are diverse at the species and group levels (Sullivan, 1978; Cahoon, 1999), but are often treated as a “black box,” where benthic microalgae are considered as a whole and the characteristics of individual key groups such as diatoms, green algae, and cyanobacteria are not evaluated individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower and higher K d values are associated with sandy and cohesive sediments, respectively (Kühl et al, 1994). Strong scattering in the former can result in both a peak light intensity at the surface of up to 200% of incident values and deeper light penetration in sediment, while a dominance by absorption in organic sediments leads to a peak irradiance at the sediment surface and more rapid down-core light attenuation (Gerbersdorf et al, 2005). Our K d values of 1.2-2.1 mm ‫1מ‬ compare most favorably with those for sandy sediments, but shapes of profiles of photon scalar irradiance more closely resemble those for cohesive sediments.…”
Section: Stephen C Whalen Et Al / 291mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High water content of the flocculent organic sediment at our sites (Table 2) is likely responsible for both low K d values and the monotonic decrease in irradiance with increasing depth below the sediment surface. Measurements of gross photosynthesis in cohesive marine sediments using O 2 microelectrodes indicate that the majority of the photosynthesis occurs in the surface 0.4 mm (Underwood and Kromkamp, 1999), while photosynthetic activity may extend to 2 mm in sandy sediment (Gerbersdorf et al, 2005). Although H 14 CO 3 ‫מ‬ -derived productivity estimates for intact cores must be cautiously interpreted due to vertical gradients of the radiocarbon label (Revsbech et al, 1981), our experiments are in qualitative agreement with these electrochemical marine observations that show a rapid decline in photosynthesis with increasing sediment depth.…”
Section: Stephen C Whalen Et Al / 291mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maximum of phytoplankton abundance was defined as a minimum of three subsequent layers/depths with Chlorophyll a concentrations exceeding the average Chlorophyll a concentration of the total vertical depth profile by more than 19% for Helgoland and 9% for Hiddensee measurements. The lower threshold for Hiddensee was at first chosen under the assumption that the higher trophic status at this water body [31] may result in shifts of the phytoplankton communities towards non-mobile species; as could be shown by Wasmund and Uhlig [32] as well as Sagert et al [33] for the German Baltic Coast. In fact, the proportion of motile flagellates has been much higher for Helgoland waters as compared to Hiddensee.…”
Section: Vertical Movement Of Phytoplankton In the Water Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%