2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical mechanism of yielding in dual nano-phase metallic glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no improvement in plasticity was observed in Pd-Si nanoglasses compared to the corresponding melt-spun ribbons [11]. Similar results were also obtained in Ni-P nanoglasses prepared by electrodeposition [14]. An interesting observation here is that the effect of Article chemical segregation is found to be negligible in both Pd-Si and Ni-P nanoglasses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, no improvement in plasticity was observed in Pd-Si nanoglasses compared to the corresponding melt-spun ribbons [11]. Similar results were also obtained in Ni-P nanoglasses prepared by electrodeposition [14]. An interesting observation here is that the effect of Article chemical segregation is found to be negligible in both Pd-Si and Ni-P nanoglasses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Improved plasticity was also reported in Fe 90 Sc 10 nanocomposites where Fe nanocrystals were found to be distributed in the amorphous matrix [15]. Besides plasticity, significant variation of the yield strength was also reported in literature, with Cu-Zr and Sc 75 Fe 25 nanoglasses showing higher yield strength during nanoindentation, while Pd-Si and Ni-P showed lower yield strength during micro-pillar tests compared to their conventional amorphous counterparts [10,11,14,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Nanoparticle-based models have also demonstrated an inherent connection between structural and chemical heterogeneities due to surface segregation prior to nanoparticle consolidation [10,11]. A range of unique properties in nanoglasses has been attributed to the presence of these interfacial regions [12,13,14] including improved mechanical performance relative to monolithic metallic glasses [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Wang et al (2015) investigated the mechanical properties of Sc 75 Fe 25 NG and HG nanopillars by using in situ tensile tests in a transmission electron microscope and found a similar trend in yield strength: the yield strength of the NG nanopillar is lower than that of the HG nanopillar with identical chemical composition. Strength softening was also observed in Ni 78 P 22 NG pillars prepared by the electrodeposition technique (Li et al, 2018).…”
Section: Size Effects On Young's Modulus and Yield Strengthmentioning
confidence: 86%