2007
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/19/r01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic methods for generating continuous droplet streams

Abstract: Microfluidic technologies have emerged recently as a promising new route for the fabrication of uniform emulsions. In this paper, we review microfluidic methods for synthesizing uniform streams of droplets and bubbles, focusing on those that utilize pressure-driven flows. Three categories of microfluidic geometries are discussed, including co-flowing streams, cross-flowing streams, and flow focusing devices. In each category we summarize observations that have been reported to date in experiments and numerical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

19
639
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 713 publications
(667 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
(276 reference statements)
19
639
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…16), which is the mostly utilized geometry in microfluidics. Dripping-jetting transition is generally explained by dimensionless numbers such as capillary, Weber and Reynolds numbers, for which we refer to other literature [179,[199][200][201]. In this review however, we would like to explain dripping-jetting transition by using parameters that are familiar to chemists, such as flow rates, polarity differences, viscosity, wettability and channel dimensions.…”
Section: Droplet Formation In Microfluidic Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16), which is the mostly utilized geometry in microfluidics. Dripping-jetting transition is generally explained by dimensionless numbers such as capillary, Weber and Reynolds numbers, for which we refer to other literature [179,[199][200][201]. In this review however, we would like to explain dripping-jetting transition by using parameters that are familiar to chemists, such as flow rates, polarity differences, viscosity, wettability and channel dimensions.…”
Section: Droplet Formation In Microfluidic Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microdroplet technology has recently emerged as a promising flexible platform for microfluidic functions. [1][2][3][4] The miniaturization of entire process enables the rapid analysis of very small quantities of samples in a portable, automated, and inexpensive format. 3 Recently, microdroplet technology has been used as microreactors for chemical analysis and protein crystallization, 5,6 as molds for curing polymeric microspheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] The miniaturization of entire process enables the rapid analysis of very small quantities of samples in a portable, automated, and inexpensive format. 3 Recently, microdroplet technology has been used as microreactors for chemical analysis and protein crystallization, 5,6 as molds for curing polymeric microspheres. 7,8 Furthermore, programmable fluidic assays for sampling glucose concentration of human physiological fluids 9 and DNA analysis 10 have been individually demonstrated using microdroplet system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly used microemulsification devices include T-junctions (Christopher and Anna 2007;Dreyfus et al 2003;Link et al 2004;Nisisako et al 2002;Thorsen et al 2001;Garstecki et al 2006), flow-focusing devices (Anna et al 2003;Ganan-Calvo 1998;Ganan-Calvo and Gordillo 2001;Xu and Nakajima 2004;Garstecki et al 2004), and devices in which liquid threads break on the terraces of microchannels (Sugiura et al 2001(Sugiura et al , 2002a. Since the generation of droplets with a predictable and reproducible size and size distribution determines their potential applications (including the synthesis of polymer colloids), several research groups have explored various aspects of the process of emulsification (Seo et al 2005a;Xu et al 2005;Zhang et al 2006;Cygan et al 2005;El-Ali et al 2005;Garstecki et al 2005a;Hudson et al 2005;Jensen and Lee 2004;Khan et al 2004;Song et al 2003;Zheng and Ismagilov 2005;Zheng et al 2003) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%