2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microenvironmental pH and microviscosity inside pH-controlled matrix tablets: An EPR imaging study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was probably the reason for higher dissolution rates observed in our experiments. The dissolution profiles of 400-mg tablets were less influenced by environmental pH under both stress and standard test conditions which may be related to the relatively slower water uptake than in the case of 50-mg tablets (22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This was probably the reason for higher dissolution rates observed in our experiments. The dissolution profiles of 400-mg tablets were less influenced by environmental pH under both stress and standard test conditions which may be related to the relatively slower water uptake than in the case of 50-mg tablets (22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…EPR imaging has been applied in the context of tracking microenvironmental pH and to spatially monitor pH and the rotational correlation time, tau(R), a parameter indicative of the surrounding microviscosity within HPMC matrix tablets [40]. In the study, fumaric, citric and succinic acids were employed as pH modifiers in a matrix tablet, with 4-(methylamino)-2-ethyl-5,5-dimethyl-4-pyridine-2-yi-2,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole-1-oxyl (MEP) as the spin label.…”
Section: Determination Of Microenvironmental Ph Using Electron Paramamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPR could provide information on both the spatial distribution and the evolution of pH within an individual hydrating tablet, providing a data over the entire course of hydration [41]. The only disadvantage of EPR studies is that the pH range that can be studied is in a narrow window, around ±1.0 to 1.5 pH units of the pK a of the spin probe [40,41]. If a wider range of pH would need to be measured, this would require running parallel studies with other spin probes with different pK a s.…”
Section: Determination Of Microenvironmental Ph Using Electron Paramamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations