1987
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(87)90262-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcanonical simulation of nuclear multifragmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this aim the Thomas Fermi type formula [14] is completed with the factor exp(−ǫ/τ ) (see Ref. [16]):…”
Section: (I) Primary Break-up Refinementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim the Thomas Fermi type formula [14] is completed with the factor exp(−ǫ/τ ) (see Ref. [16]):…”
Section: (I) Primary Break-up Refinementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bugaev et al [23] have taken the model beyond this range of density and find that the critical density is ρ/ρ 0 = 1 and the temperature is 18 MeV when the surface tension σ(T ) goes to zero. We end this section by noting that microcanonical calculations using statistical equilibrium were also suggestive of a first order phase transition occurring at intermediate energy [24,6].…”
Section: Signatures From Thermodynamic Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At these energies, the efforts switched to microcanonical ensembles although the concept of temperature was sometimes used [6,7,8]. One model called the Copenhagen SMM (statistical multifragmentation model) is frequently used [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty is due to the nontrivial dynamical effects contained in the experimental data. Even though it may be true that the part of the system is equilibrated in good approximation as is indicated by the success of statistical models [1,21,22,23], the ambiguities enter in the data analysis through the identification of the equilibrated thermal source. On the other hand, there are several models which can predict the experimental observables without such ambiguities by simulating the dynamics of these reactions microscopically [24,25,26,27,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%