2018
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial mechanisms of carbon priming effects revealed during the interaction of crop residue and nutrient inputs in contrasting soils

Abstract: Agronomic practices such as crop residue return and additional nutrient supply are recommended to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) in arable farmlands. However, changes in the priming effect (PE) on native SOC mineralization in response to integrated inputs of residue and nutrients are not fully known. This knowledge gap along with a lack of understanding of microbial mechanisms hinders the ability to constrain models and to reduce the uncertainty to predict carbon (C) sequestration potential. Using a C-labe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Biochar and LOM contain different forms of C for use by various microorganisms; hence, the input of biochar and LOM can influence the microbial community and consequently the interactive priming effects. For example, the easily available C (such as glucose-type C) increases bacterial growth but might decrease fungal growth (Meidute, Demoling, & Bååth, 2008), whereas crop residues increase growth of both bacterial and fungal communities (Fang, Nazaries, Singh, & Singh, 2018;Meidute et al, 2008). Biochar increases the fungal community (Farrell et al, 2013;Steinbeiss, Gleixner, & Antonietti, 2009) and Gram-positive bacteria in soil (Farrell et al, 2013;Santos, Torn, & Bird, 2012), which might be related to the use of labile-C in biochar over the short term (Farrell et al, 2013).…”
Section: Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochar and LOM contain different forms of C for use by various microorganisms; hence, the input of biochar and LOM can influence the microbial community and consequently the interactive priming effects. For example, the easily available C (such as glucose-type C) increases bacterial growth but might decrease fungal growth (Meidute, Demoling, & Bååth, 2008), whereas crop residues increase growth of both bacterial and fungal communities (Fang, Nazaries, Singh, & Singh, 2018;Meidute et al, 2008). Biochar increases the fungal community (Farrell et al, 2013;Steinbeiss, Gleixner, & Antonietti, 2009) and Gram-positive bacteria in soil (Farrell et al, 2013;Santos, Torn, & Bird, 2012), which might be related to the use of labile-C in biochar over the short term (Farrell et al, 2013).…”
Section: Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There three mechanisms, which are classified by different researchers based on the stabilization of SOM, include chemical, biochemical and physical stabilization [76]. Agricultural practices such as the addition of crop residues increase the SOM as well as nutrients contents in the soil by integrated nutrient management [77]. Most studies focus on the fact that the change of crop residue traits has positive effects of the soil CS in organic farming system [78].…”
Section: Crop Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the balance in microbial competition between micro‐organism communities specialized in the decomposition of easily degradable organic compounds and those feeding on polymerized SOC may further explain differences in soil PE (Fontaine et al, ). In this context, the chemical composition of fresh litter inputs could be a critical driver of SOC degradation by regulating the balance between different functional types of soil microbial communities (Fang, Nazaries, Singh, & Singh, ; Fanin, Hättenschwiler, & Fromin, ). Despite this, the relationship between litter chemistry and PEs remains largely unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%