2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Contamination in Next Generation Sequencing: Implications for Sequence-Based Analysis of Clinical Samples

Abstract: The high level of accuracy and sensitivity of next generation sequencing for quantifying genetic material across organismal boundaries gives it tremendous potential for pathogen discovery and diagnosis in human disease. Despite this promise, substantial bacterial contamination is routinely found in existing human-derived RNA-seq datasets that likely arises from environmental sources. This raises the need for stringent sequencing and analysis protocols for studies investigating sequence-based microbial signatur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
141
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manual BLAST analysis of the corresponding EBV reads excluded the possibility of misalignment of human reads to the EBV genome. We therefore suspect that similar to our contention regarding low read numbers detected for other viruses, these low numbers of EBV reads most likely reflect cross-contamination during sample processing and/or sequencing (58).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Manual BLAST analysis of the corresponding EBV reads excluded the possibility of misalignment of human reads to the EBV genome. We therefore suspect that similar to our contention regarding low read numbers detected for other viruses, these low numbers of EBV reads most likely reflect cross-contamination during sample processing and/or sequencing (58).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Nevertheless, the low read numbers in these cases suggest that they are most likely due to cross-contamination during sequencing rather than transcription from endogenous viruses (see M. J. Strong et al [58] and below). In contrast, more than 10,000 reads were found for EBV, KSHV, HTLV-1 and murine retroviruses (see Table S2 in the supplemental material and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, sequences of bacterial origin can contaminate eukaryotic genome assembly results due to their occurrence in samples [17,18], DNA extraction kits [19], or laboratory environments [20,21]. One of the major challenges of working with eukaryotic genomes is the extent of repeat regions that complicate the assembly process [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential concern is the growth of a wild frontier of microbial genome and microbiome analyses performed by non‐experts, hand‐cranking data through pipelines that they do not fully understand and then naively interpreting results without engaging the healthy scepticism of the seasoned expert (Bhatt et al ., 2013; Branton et al ., 2013; Laurence et al ., 2014; Salter et al ., 2014; Strong et al ., 2014; Ackelsberg et al ., 2015; Afshinnekoo et al ., 2015). Eternal vigilance is likely to be the price of containing the equivalent of microbial genomic astrology!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%