2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2010338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-aerial vehicle type wall-climbing robot mechanism for structural health monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, horizontal approach manoeuvres, for both fixed wings and rotor-based robots require the contact mechanism to hold while the robot is cantilevered, unless the robot aligns its structure near to the surface (figure 3i-m) [44,46-48, 54,59,147]. Some quadrotors align themselves with the surface by pivoting nose-down (figure 3o-q) [41,49,53,140,141] or dropping below (figure 3n) [58] into an inverted configuration. The extra thrust from the rotors in the nose-down configuration can facilitate engagement of the attachment mechanism.…”
Section: Landing and Take-off In Aerial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, horizontal approach manoeuvres, for both fixed wings and rotor-based robots require the contact mechanism to hold while the robot is cantilevered, unless the robot aligns its structure near to the surface (figure 3i-m) [44,46-48, 54,59,147]. Some quadrotors align themselves with the surface by pivoting nose-down (figure 3o-q) [41,49,53,140,141] or dropping below (figure 3n) [58] into an inverted configuration. The extra thrust from the rotors in the nose-down configuration can facilitate engagement of the attachment mechanism.…”
Section: Landing and Take-off In Aerial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface attachment solutions include grasping, claws, adhesive pads and suction [18,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. Some prototypes have begun to navigate surfaces with these techniques [41,44,[139][140][141]. Take-off typically depends on the landing approach.…”
Section: Air-surface Transitions In Aerial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8) [14]. The rotating part of the nacelle is also equipped with an independent stabilization system, which makes it possible to keep the camera at the right angle even when the aircraft is manoeuvring [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall climbing locomotion of the aerial robot can be accomplished by the combination of the thrust force and wheel drive force with maximized friction between the wheel and the surface [3][4][5]. If the friction coefficient is higher than 1, the robot can stick to the vertical surface with the thrust force toward to the wall.…”
Section: Concept Of a Drone-type Wall-climbing Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%