2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9lc00512a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

micrIO: an open-source autosampler and fraction collector for automated microfluidic input–output

Abstract: MicrIO is a low-cost, open-source hardware and software solution for automated sample input/output, bridging the gap between microfluidic devices and standard multiwell plates.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce cost and facilitate custom applications, a number of open-source fraction collectors have been developed, e.g. (Caputo et al, 2020;Longwell and Fordyce, 2020) . These devices, while less expensive, continue to rely on complex engineering designs and parts that may be difficult to source and manufacture, thus driving costs higher, lengthening the assembly process, and complicating operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce cost and facilitate custom applications, a number of open-source fraction collectors have been developed, e.g. (Caputo et al, 2020;Longwell and Fordyce, 2020) . These devices, while less expensive, continue to rely on complex engineering designs and parts that may be difficult to source and manufacture, thus driving costs higher, lengthening the assembly process, and complicating operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colosseum fraction collector can be assembled in less than an hour and costs $67.02. Unlike the micrIO (Longwell and Fordyce, 2020) , which is built from parts of a salvaged Illumina Genome Analyzer that costs $1500, the colosseum fraction collector uses off-the-shelf and 3D-printed parts (Supplementary Table 2). The LEGO MINDSTORM fraction collector (Caputo et al, 2020) costs $500, and while it uses more commonly available components, it still requires cutting and bending of steel C-channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b), similar to manual pipetting and other robots. 7,10,[27][28][29][30] The resulting volumes varied from the target volume by +/-2 μ L regardless of the target volume, suggesting droplet retention at the pipet tip rather than pump inaccuracies as the source of this variation (see below). When testing the impact of pumping speed on accuracy, resulting volumes were within 1-2% of the target volume for 10, 25, and 50 µL/s.…”
Section: Robust Media Exchange In Multi-well Plates Via Automated Pipettingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…So far, there have been no reports of 3D printed autosamplers. In many currently available autosamplers, each sample probe/needle is driven by three orthogonal linear motion stages to obtain translational freedom in all three dimensions [11]. Such autosamplers can be used to access large number of vials, but are expensive and have large footprints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%