2011
DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…123 While identical conventional and customary rules could coexist in principle, 124 In the case of non-discrimination in international trade, there is no opinio juris to support the granting of MFN or National Treatment without an international treaty. 126 Both MFN 127 and National Treatment 128 are purely treaty-based obligations, and thus both derive their binding force from the treaty which embodies them. Article 7 of the ILC Draft Articles on MFN clearly provides that "no State is entitled to most-favoured-nation treatment by another State unless that State has undertaken an international obligation to accord such treatment."…”
Section: Economic Non-discrimination and Sovereign Equality Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…123 While identical conventional and customary rules could coexist in principle, 124 In the case of non-discrimination in international trade, there is no opinio juris to support the granting of MFN or National Treatment without an international treaty. 126 Both MFN 127 and National Treatment 128 are purely treaty-based obligations, and thus both derive their binding force from the treaty which embodies them. Article 7 of the ILC Draft Articles on MFN clearly provides that "no State is entitled to most-favoured-nation treatment by another State unless that State has undertaken an international obligation to accord such treatment."…”
Section: Economic Non-discrimination and Sovereign Equality Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La CNMF es considerada como uno de los pilares del derecho comercial internacional (Dolzer y Schreuer, 2012: 207). Aun cuando no forma parte del derecho internacional consuetudinario (Dolzer y Schreuer, 2012;Paparinskis, 2013;Acconci, 2005), sino que corresponde a una obligación que debe figurar en los Tratados para poder ser invocada (UNCTAD, 2010), y precisamente por eso, se considera fundamental, entre otras razones, pues permite evitar la discriminación en el tráfico entre distintos Estados.…”
Section: Introduciendo La Cláusula De Nación Más Favorecidaunclassified