2021
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2020.3012705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MFALNet: A Multiscale Feature Aggregation Lightweight Network for Semantic Segmentation of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last class only appears in few training tiles and does not have a strong semantic meaning, since it includes all of the surface covers that do not belong to the other well-defined classes. Hence, it was removed from the experimentation (similar to previous works [22], [23]).…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last class only appears in few training tiles and does not have a strong semantic meaning, since it includes all of the surface covers that do not belong to the other well-defined classes. Hence, it was removed from the experimentation (similar to previous works [22], [23]).…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISPRS Potsdam dataset contains 38 images with IRRG channels at a spatial resolution of 5 cm and of size 6000 As previously done by other authors in [46], [47], [48], the results for the clutter class, which includes all covers that are not attributed to the other classes and mixes water bodies, background, and others in the same thematic class, were excluded from the averaged metrics. This class accounts for only a small percentage of pixels.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it accounts for only a small percentage of pixels. Following the example of previous authors [18,19,20], the results of the class "clutter" were excluded from the averaged metrics.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%