2021
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEWpy: a computational strain optimization workbench in Python

Abstract: Summary Metabolic Engineering aims to favour the overproduction of native, as well as non-native, metabolites by modifying or extending the cellular processes of a specific organism. In this context, Computational Strain Optimization (CSO) plays a relevant role by putting forward mathematical approaches able to identify potential metabolic modifications to achieve the defined production goals. We present MEWpy, a Python workbench for metabolic engineering, which covers a wide range of metabol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full workflow for data integration has been illustrated in Figure 2. The media conditions for each cell line are defined as a preliminary step, and have been described in Supplementary table 1.These were integrated using the MEWpy ‘get_simulator’ function, setting the final media dictionary as the ‘envcond’ argument (Pereira et al, 2021). A limitation of defining media for human GEMs is the inclusion of fetal bovine serum (FBS), which is a complex, difficult to define solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full workflow for data integration has been illustrated in Figure 2. The media conditions for each cell line are defined as a preliminary step, and have been described in Supplementary table 1.These were integrated using the MEWpy ‘get_simulator’ function, setting the final media dictionary as the ‘envcond’ argument (Pereira et al, 2021). A limitation of defining media for human GEMs is the inclusion of fetal bovine serum (FBS), which is a complex, difficult to define solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides efficient, parallelized implementations of standard in silico strain design methods for predicting gene knockout strategies (OptGene [evolutionary algorithm] ( 40 ), OptKnock [linear programming] ( 42 ) and for predicting gene expression modulation targets (Differential FVA, Flux Scanning based on Enforced Objective Flux [FSEOF] ( 43 ). Instead of modulating genes, there are algorithms that optimize at the regulatory level by changing transcription factors, such as OptRAM ( 44 ) and OptORF ( 46 ) in MEWpy (Metabolic Engineering Workbench in python) ( 45 ). These simulation tools for strain design and in silico knockouts/perturbations can be easily adapted to study metabolism in the context of physiology and disease, especially cancer.…”
Section: Cobra Methods In Pythonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we take the minimum expression of required subunits, but take the sum of isozyme expression. This calculation can be performed in Python packages like CORDA (Cost Optimization Reaction Dependency Assessment) ( 49 ) and MEWpy ( 45 ). Marín de Mas et al further improved GPR evaluation in their Python implementation of stoichiometric GPR (S-GPR) that considers the stoichiometry of protein subunits ( 104 ).…”
Section: Cobra Methods In Pythonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the first method of its kind, OptKnock ( Burgard et al , 2003 ) harnessed mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) for the rational design of microbial production hosts based on the concept of growth-coupled production. Today, a plethora of computational methods exists for various applications of metabolic design, for example, to enforce growth-coupled or even growth-independent production of a target chemical or to find synthetic lethals ( Cardoso et al , 2018 ; Jensen et al , 2019 ; Pereira et al , 2021 ; Schneider et al , 2020 , 2021 ; Tepper and Shlomi, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the increasing number of constraint-based modeling tools developed in Python [e.g. ScrumPy ( Poolman, 2006 ), COBRApy ( Ebrahim et al , 2013 ), cameo ( Cardoso et al , 2018 ), OptCouple ( Jensen et al , 2019 ), ReFramed ( https://zenodo.org/record/4700490 ), CNApy ( Thiele et al , 2021 ) and MEWpy ( Pereira et al , 2021 )], available packages with strain design algorithms are still distributed over different platforms including the Python packages mentioned above, the MATLAB-based COBRA toolbox ( Heirendt et al , 2019 ) and CellNetAnalyzer ( von Kamp et al , 2017 ), as well as the Java-based OptFlux ( Rocha et al , 2010 ). Moreover, each of these packages focuses only on one or very few of the published design methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%