2006 Ieee/Aiaa 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2006.313681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods to Provide System-Wide ADS-B Back-Up, Validation and Security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Distance bounding protocols [24,8,9,10] are two-way ranging protocols that rely on cryptographic techniques to enable a verifier to establish an upper bound on the physical distance to a prover. Mutlilateration is a passive localization technique based on the time difference of arrival (TDoA) of signals at geographically distributed stations that can be used for location verification [25,26,27]. However, these approaches only allow for verification of the position of a target, not its velocity and heading.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance bounding protocols [24,8,9,10] are two-way ranging protocols that rely on cryptographic techniques to enable a verifier to establish an upper bound on the physical distance to a prover. Mutlilateration is a passive localization technique based on the time difference of arrival (TDoA) of signals at geographically distributed stations that can be used for location verification [25,26,27]. However, these approaches only allow for verification of the position of a target, not its velocity and heading.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost has regularly been named as a main driver of NextGen air traffic adoption [15]. Conventional PSR and SSR technologies are both more expensive to deploy and experience much higher wear and tear compared to ADS-B.…”
Section: Why Is Securing Ads-b a Problem?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in Europe and Asia have reported frequently occurring ADS-B position errors reaching up to 7.5 nm (Ali et al 2013;Smith and Cassell 2006;Zhang et al 2011). The main causes for ADS-B not meeting their performance standards are: (1) frequency congestion due to other avionics using the same 1090-MHz frequency spectrum, (2) delays in the broadcasted messages and (3) missed update cycles, resulting mostly in in-trail position errors.…”
Section: Information Requirements and Error Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it has been shown that ADS-B accuracy is already sufficient enough to meet separation standards and thus could eventually replace current radar technology (e.g., Jones 2003). On the other hand, several studies indicated that offsets between radar and ADS-B position reports could reach up to 7.5 nautical miles (Ali et al 2013;Zhang et al 2011;Smith and Cassell 2006). Despite the fact that continuous efforts are being undertaken by the ATM community to improve the quality of ADS-B reports, such position offsets do provide an interesting case study for fault detection and diagnosis in an airspace where ADS-B technology is used to augment radar data with auxiliary aircraft data, such as the planned waypoint(s), estimated time of arrival, GPS and/or inertial navigation system positions and indicated air speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%