2017
DOI: 10.1515/afe-2017-0087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of the Detection and Identification of Structural Defects in Saturated Metallic Composite Castings

Abstract: Diagnostics of composite castings, due to their complex structure, requires that their characteristics are tested by an appropriate description method. Any deviation from the specific characteristic will be regarded as a material defect. The detection of defects in composite castings sometimes is not sufficient and the defects have to be identified. This study classifies defects found in the structures of saturated metallic composite castings and indicates those stages of the process where such defects are lik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• SMARTER method (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant or Realistic or Rewarding, Time-bound, Exciting or Evaluated, Recorded or Reward) (Lawlor & Hornyak, 2012); • Method for selecting a team of experts (Kupraszewicz & Zółtowski, 2002;); • Brainstorming (BM) (Putman & Paulus, 2008); • Causes-and-effects diagram (Ishikawa diagram or herringbone diagram) (Chokkalingam et al, 2017;Gawdzińska, 2011); • FAHP method (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) (Katunin et al, 2021;Siwiec & Pacana, 2021d); • FTOPSIS method (Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) (Jarosińska & Berczyński, 2021;Khedmatgozar et al, 2021;Minutolo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Assumptions Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• SMARTER method (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant or Realistic or Rewarding, Time-bound, Exciting or Evaluated, Recorded or Reward) (Lawlor & Hornyak, 2012); • Method for selecting a team of experts (Kupraszewicz & Zółtowski, 2002;); • Brainstorming (BM) (Putman & Paulus, 2008); • Causes-and-effects diagram (Ishikawa diagram or herringbone diagram) (Chokkalingam et al, 2017;Gawdzińska, 2011); • FAHP method (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) (Katunin et al, 2021;Siwiec & Pacana, 2021d); • FTOPSIS method (Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) (Jarosińska & Berczyński, 2021;Khedmatgozar et al, 2021;Minutolo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Assumptions Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The team evaluates all improvement actions using the multiple voting technique and fuzzy scales. The assessments provided by the T th expert for improvement action A i and the group of main causes C j are noted using formula (5) (Alt et al, 2019;Gawdzińska, 2011;Pacana et al, 2020):…”
Section: Stage 6 Determining Improvement Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall quality is a matter of dimensional accuracy, surface finish, and internal soundness. To achieve the desired and exceptional range of mechanical properties, casting should be free of internal defects, both in macro and micro scale [2][3][4][5][6]. To find the first group of defects, the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) methods like Ultrasonic Testing (UT) or Radiography Testing (RT) can be employed, which nowadays is quite a traditional approach [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonmetallic inclusions in the material or poor-quality material joints can also reduce the service life of lids [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. To determine if this is the cause of the damage, studies must be carried out and the results compared [ 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%