2017
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.c17-00096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Evaluating the Stimuli-Responsive Delivery of Nucleic Acid and Gene Medicines

Abstract: In this review, we have summarized evaluation methods for the analysis of external stimuli-mediated nucleic acid and gene delivery. Prior to reviewing these evaluation methods, we describe various delivery processes of nucleic acid and gene medicines (small interfering RNA (siRNA), micro RNA, mRNA, plasmid DNA, etc.), which include interaction with blood components, bio-distribution, disposition in the target tissue, cell entry, intracellular trafficking, nuclear localization, and dissociation from the carrier… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transfection is a key technology for studying gene expression, protein transport and localization. Effective transfection methods are the basis of many studies (Faneca et al ., 2010; Fumoto & Nishida, 2017). In this study, the transfection efficiency was not significantly improved by adjusting the proportion of plasmid and liposome, transfection time or composition of transfection reagent (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfection is a key technology for studying gene expression, protein transport and localization. Effective transfection methods are the basis of many studies (Faneca et al ., 2010; Fumoto & Nishida, 2017). In this study, the transfection efficiency was not significantly improved by adjusting the proportion of plasmid and liposome, transfection time or composition of transfection reagent (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38−40 Furthermore, positron-emission tomography of radiolabeled mRNAs and carriers or the detection of specific mRNA-encoded reporter proteins have been used. 38 However, the informative value of bioluminescence imaging and positron-emission tomography is limited, because both methods will not generate high-resolution images or detect single cells. Only when combined with more sophisticated methods such as photoacoustic tomography serial block-face imaging 41,42 or optical-sectioning microscopy, 43 high-resolution 3D images can be produced.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard for visualizing mRNA delivery in mice has been bioluminescence imaging of luciferase activity or the labeling of mRNA and/or carrier molecules with fluorescent dyes. Furthermore, positron-emission tomography of radiolabeled mRNAs and carriers or the detection of specific mRNA-encoded reporter proteins have been used . However, the informative value of bioluminescence imaging and positron-emission tomography is limited, because both methods will not generate high-resolution images or detect single cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the development of non-viral vectors, it is necessary to evaluate not only the efficiency of gene transfer, but also the formulation characteristics, internal and cellular behavior, and safety [ 309 ]. We summarized methods for evaluation of nucleic acid and gene medicines in Table 1 .…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%