Methodological Issues in Emergent Evaluations of Health Programs: Lessons From Iberoamerica

Abstract

There has been growing interest in nonmainstream approaches to assessing health programs, but methodological strategies have not been a concern. In this article, we review methodological strategies used in emergent evaluations of health policies and programs in Iberoamerica, focusing on participatory, qualitative, critical, hermeneutical, bottom-up, collaborative, and transdisciplinary approaches. A literature search was performed combining strategies: database review, consultation of bibliography, expert interviews, and search engines. The review took place from 2003 to 2006. Research published in the past two decades was included. Nearly 70 articles were found on emergent research and evaluation of health programs in the region. Participatory and qualitative approaches were the most used. Theoretical issues are more emphasized than are methodological ones. Data gathering also was more explored than were design, participant selection, or analysis. The frequently used methodological strategies contradict some basic assumptions of the emergent evaluative research, such as its participatory and collaborative nature.

Evaluation of a College-Community Approach to Developing Multi-level Primary Health Care-Population Health Promotion Practicums for Nursing Students

“…This approach applies principles of transparency, collaboration, participation, and democracy with key stakeholders who are engaged as co-researchers within the design, implementation and analysis data in of the inquiry process (Mercado-Martinez, Tejada-Tayabas, & Springett,, 2008). Emergent approaches draw on both quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate aspects of a program that are relevant to the various stakeholders (Mercado-Martinez et al).…”

A prospective evaluation of first people’s health promotion program design in the goulburn-murray rivers region

“…All three ACCOs identified that their programs were not being evaluated and reported in ways that reflect how they address social determinants of First Peoples’ health and the holistic nature of their design [5]. This is not unique to this region or country [6–8]. Each of the ACCOs were locked into certain funding arrangements (which largely neglected prevention activities) that prevented them working together to achieve common goals.…”

Qualitative evaluation: A critical and interpretative complementary approach to improve health programs and services

“…Among other goals, these methods seek to improve the management of public programs by promoting the democratization of institutions, by strengthening the transparency of the processes involved and empowering the programs’ beneficiaries to take a more active role, and by promoting the participation of individuals or groups traditionally excluded (Mercado, Tejada-Tayabas, & Springett, 2008). …”