2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2005.05.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane activation on Ni(111): Effects of poisons and step defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
170
2
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
20
170
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…6,40 Our results suggest that modifying the nickel step-sites could provide a way to control graphene formation. Additives, such as atomic sulfur, carbon, Ag and Au, all show a preference for adsorption at the steps on Ni͑111͒, 16,25,27,41 and it has been demonstrated that such additives will decrease the reactivity of methane reforming and at the same time block formation of graphitic structures at the steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,40 Our results suggest that modifying the nickel step-sites could provide a way to control graphene formation. Additives, such as atomic sulfur, carbon, Ag and Au, all show a preference for adsorption at the steps on Ni͑111͒, 16,25,27,41 and it has been demonstrated that such additives will decrease the reactivity of methane reforming and at the same time block formation of graphitic structures at the steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,25,26 For methane, the activation of the first C-H bond is rate-limiting for the decomposition and it is associated with an activation energy barrier, obtained from DFT, of less than 1 eV at the undercoordinated step sites on Ni. 16,27 The decomposition barrier is less than the barriers we identify for graphene growth, and methane decomposition will, therefore, not be considered further in the following.…”
Section: A Energetics Of Carbon Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For NiAl(110) it is noticable that CO is most stable on the Ni-rich surface. The reason for this is, that Ni in the topmost layer is stretched relative to a bulk Ni lattice constant resulting in a stronger binding [52,53,54]. In all cases, Ni adsorbs in a three-fold hollow site, except for the NiAl(110) bulk terminated surface, on which it adsorbs atop.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Comentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While the closed packed and defect free Ni(111) surface is rather resistant with respect to carbon formation [30], steps, e.g. at Ni(211), are nucleation sites for carbon growth causing catalyst deactivation [32]. The calculations of Wang et al [30] show that surface O and H atoms remove carbon deposits efficiently.…”
Section: Dry Reformingmentioning
confidence: 99%