1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01828.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methacrylate sensitivity and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dermatologic hazards of TENS are most commonly irritant, with contact allergy also having been reported to nickel, rubber chemicals and adhesives, as well as to propylene glycol in the conductive gel (2–4). Clearly, our patient reacts instead to electrical current being passed through the skin (5, 6), allergic contact dermatitis having been excluded.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dermatologic hazards of TENS are most commonly irritant, with contact allergy also having been reported to nickel, rubber chemicals and adhesives, as well as to propylene glycol in the conductive gel (2–4). Clearly, our patient reacts instead to electrical current being passed through the skin (5, 6), allergic contact dermatitis having been excluded.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, 4 cases of contact allergy to (meth)acrylates used in TENS have been reported . Prior to that, there were reported cases of allergic contact dermatitis caused by propylene glycol in a conductive gel used for TENS application , 1 case report of contact allergy to nickel in a TENS electrode , and 1 case report of TENS contact dermatitis in which the allergen was not identified .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review found three reported cases of ACD to (meth)acrylates used as an adhesive in TENS (6, 7). Patch testing results of those cases, as well as period of use, can be seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%