2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallophthalocyanine functionalized magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles and its application in ultrasound-assisted oxidation of benzothiophene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A report [55,56,57] indicated that a reaction time of at least 30 min would be required to achieve 90% BT and DBT conversion. In the present study, the reaction time required was only 20 min, allowing for the reduction of BT and DBT content in the model oil to 140 and 47 ppmw, with sulfur removal efficiencies of 86% and 95%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A report [55,56,57] indicated that a reaction time of at least 30 min would be required to achieve 90% BT and DBT conversion. In the present study, the reaction time required was only 20 min, allowing for the reduction of BT and DBT content in the model oil to 140 and 47 ppmw, with sulfur removal efficiencies of 86% and 95%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface morphology of the nanoparticles was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The accelerating voltage was 10 kV and the observation time was as short as possible 30. The hyaluronic acid conjugation with NH 2 -MSNs was analyzed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry 31.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al fulfilled two separate studies [118] , [119] concerning sonocatalytic ODS (followed by extraction with methanol) of benzothiophene in the presence of H 2 O 2 at 60 °C using core–shell nanosphere modified with metallophthalocyanine (tetra-substituted carboxyl iron phthalocyanine, FeC 4 Pc) encapsulated into magnetic mesopore silica nanoparticles and silica nanotube catalyst with magnetite nanoparticles-coated interior surface and FeC 4 Pc-modified inner and outer surface. Higher desulfurization of the former (at the same conditions, desulfurization near 94.5%) compared to the latter (76% desulfurization yield at 30 min and molar ratio of H 2 O 2 /S = 15) can be considerably clarified by the fact that the particle size (60 nm) and the average pore size (2.6 nm) of the nanosphere composite catalyst are smaller than the outer diameter of the nanotube catalyst (200 nm), hence providing larger surface area for adsorption, though the catalyst loading is not specified in the latter.…”
Section: Types Of Catalysts In Uaodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Fig. 4 DPEs in the presence of heterogeneous catalysts (where 1–3, 4, 5–7, 8, 9, [10,14], 11, 12, 13, [15,19], 16, 17, 18, 20, 21 and 22 represent the references [98] , [133] , [134] , [84] , [151] , [145] , [97] , [119] , [118] , [126] , [124] , [123] , [150] , [65] , [78] , [121] , respectively). *49, 43.50 and 35.50 are DPE values calculated for DBT, 4,6-DMDBT and BT, respectively, pertaining to reference [98] .
…”
Section: Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%