_________________________________________________________________________________________The redox flexibility of transition-element centres allied with the closo-nido-arachno-etc redox flexibility of boron-containing cluster structures engenders much interesting metallaborane structural, behavioural, and reaction chemistry [1,2]. Rhodium and iridium metallaboranes have figured significantly in this regard, for example in terms of reactions, both catalytic and non-catalytic [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], in phenomena such as fluxionalities [10,11], and in the establishment of interesting cluster types, such as those of 'isocloso' and 'isonido' geometries [12-15]. Single-cluster borane, heteroborane and metallaborane chemistry is governed at present by an uppermost limit to cluster size of about fourteen vertices [16,17]: to extend beyond this horizon the clusters need to be linked or fused together to make bigger cluster assemblies. Intimate intercluster fusions, with two or more atoms held in common between the constituent subclusters, result in so-called 'macropolyhedral' species [18][19][20][21], in which the multicentre bonding characteristics of boron extend across the nexus between the constituent subclusters. The structural flexibility resulting from the incorporation of rhodium and iridium centres in macropolyhedral metallaborane assemblies has been most useful in the development of this macropolyhedral area [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The addition of electrons to the cluster in a single-cluster compound generally results in cluster opening along the closo-nido-arachno-etc sequence; conversely, removal of electrons generally results in cluster closure [30].In macropolyhedral boron-containing cluster compounds, in which single clusters are fused together, the addition or removal of electrons can, alternatively, result in a decease or an increase, respectively, in the degree of intimacy of intercluster fusion, rather than the opening or closing of individual subclusters [6,18,20,29]. For the development and understanding of intercluster fusion chemistry, there is merit in establishing systems in which such alternative behaviours can be observed and defined. . In compound 1, the cluster structure (schematic I A) is that of a nido twelve-vertex {IrB 11 } unit fused with a nido ten-vertex {B 10 } unit, with three boron atoms held in common (schematic I B). By contrast, in compound 2, the cluster structure (schematic II A) is that of a nido eleven-vertex {IrB 10 } unit fused with a nido ten-vertex {B 10 } unit, but now with only two boron atoms held in common (schematic II B). In the overall formation of 8 from 1 , the two-electron gain associated with the incorporation of the PH 2 Ph ligand is cancelled by the two-electron loss associated with the elimination of dihydrogen (equation 2, where L is PH 2 Ph ); overall, the three-atoms-in-common configuration is thence retained, and the individual subclusters retain their individual nido characters. The observations involving the conversion of rhodium compound 4 ...