2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)00804-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal sequential extraction procedure optimized for heavily polluted and iron oxide rich sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Following these two basic schemes, some modified procedures with different sequences of reagents or operational conditions have been developed (Borovec et al, 1993;Campanella et al, 1995;Zdenek, 1996;Gomez Ariza et al, 2000). Considering the diversity of procedures and lack of uniformity in different protocols, a BCR (now the European Community (EC) Standards Measurement and Testing Programme) method was proposed (Ure et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these two basic schemes, some modified procedures with different sequences of reagents or operational conditions have been developed (Borovec et al, 1993;Campanella et al, 1995;Zdenek, 1996;Gomez Ariza et al, 2000). Considering the diversity of procedures and lack of uniformity in different protocols, a BCR (now the European Community (EC) Standards Measurement and Testing Programme) method was proposed (Ure et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analytical procedure involves sequential chemical extractions separating trace metals into five fractions: exchangeable, bound to carbonates, bound to Fe-Mn oxides, bound to organic matter, and residual. Simplified sequential extraction methods have also been developed for practical applications (Aten and Gupta, 1996;Cai et al, 2002;Gomez-Ariza et al, 2000;Gupta et al, 1996;Pantsar-Kallio and Manninen, 1997). For example, the three-level evaluation system, which separates metals into mobile, mobilizable, and pseudo total metal fractions, seems to be attractive because of its simplicity and potential application in risk assessment and risk management .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been the subject of a number of variations [18][19][20][21]. Briefly, the procedure is as follows: fractions 1 to 3 (F1-F3) are the results of extraction with ammonium acetate, a reductive solution made of hydroxylamine hydrochloride in acetic acid, and hydrogen peroxide in a nitric medium, respectively, whereas fraction 4 (F4) is the insoluble residue remaining after the three extractions (Table 4).…”
Section: Assessing the Hazardousness Of Metals In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%