2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-poor stars towards the Galactic bulge: A population potpourri

Abstract: We present a comprehensive chemical abundance analysis of five red giants and two horizontal branch (HB) stars towards the southern edge of the Galactic bulge, at (l, b) ∼ (0 • ,−11 • ). Based on high-resolution spectroscopy obtained with the Magellan/MIKE spectrograph, we derived up to 23 chemical element abundances and identify a mixed bag of stars, representing various populations in the central regions of the Galaxy. Although cosmological simulations predict that the inner Galaxy was host to the first star… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
87
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(205 reference statements)
10
87
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This distinction is significant because the inside-out formation of the Galaxy dictates that the oldest and most (extremely) metal-poor stars should be found in the very center (Tumlinson 2010), rendering them inner halo stars (by formation and chemistry) that happen to be located within the bulge. While still low in numbers, the very metal-poor bulge stars known to date show chemical abundances that vastly overlap with those of the metal-poor halo distribution (e.g., Casey & Schlaufman 2015;Koch et al 2016;Howes et al 2015). Their kinematics then indicates that their orbits are mainly confined to the inner few kpc of the Galaxy (although the star we consider here is not confined to the innermost parts).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This distinction is significant because the inside-out formation of the Galaxy dictates that the oldest and most (extremely) metal-poor stars should be found in the very center (Tumlinson 2010), rendering them inner halo stars (by formation and chemistry) that happen to be located within the bulge. While still low in numbers, the very metal-poor bulge stars known to date show chemical abundances that vastly overlap with those of the metal-poor halo distribution (e.g., Casey & Schlaufman 2015;Koch et al 2016;Howes et al 2015). Their kinematics then indicates that their orbits are mainly confined to the inner few kpc of the Galaxy (although the star we consider here is not confined to the innermost parts).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, CEMP stars are not found in all environments. For instance, only a few s-process rich CEMP stars have been detected in the direction of the Milky Way bulge (Howes et al 2015;Koch et al 2016) and studies generally tend to find a lower fraction of CEMP stars in dSphs (Kirby et al 2015;Jablonka et al 2015;Chiti et al 2018), but a small number have been detected in the ultrafaint dwarf galaxies (Frebel & Norris 2015).…”
Section: The Signature Of Carbon In the Sagittarius Dsphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stars are likely part of the bar in the plane beyond the boxy extent of the bulge l > 10° ; these [ ]< −1.0 show a slower rotation and flatter dispersion that aligns them with a halo population in the innermost region or else a unique metalpoor bulge population formed at early times (see Howes et al 2015;Koch et al 2015).…”
Section: Kinematics As a Function Of [Fe/h] Into The Midplanementioning
confidence: 99%