1993
DOI: 10.1172/jci116293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins during alimentary lipemia.

Abstract: The metabolism of chylomicron remnants and VLDL was studied in healthy controls and normo-(NTG) and hypertriglyceridemic (HTG) patients with coronary artery disease after intake of an oral fat load. Specific determination of apo B-48 and B-100 enabled separation of the respective contribution of the two lipoprotein species. The postprandial plasma levels of small (Sf 20-60) and large (Sf 60-400) chylomicron remnants increased in controls and NTG patients. In contrast, only large chylomicron remnants increased … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
134
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
11
134
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When groups are studied where there is greater variability in body weight (i.e., with large range of body weights and therefore blood volumes), it may be preferable to use the alternative approach in which the amount of nutrients/ energy in the test meal is estimated as unit amount per kg body weight (Cohn et al, 1988a(Cohn et al, , b, 1993Lopez-Miranda et al, 1997;Shishebor et al, 1999) or body surface area (Weintraub et al, 1988;Karpe et al, 1993). Although this may be considered a more valid approach because it takes account of greater blood volume in larger subjects, it should be considered that in adults the main variable influencing body weight is variation in fat mass.…”
Section: Meal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When groups are studied where there is greater variability in body weight (i.e., with large range of body weights and therefore blood volumes), it may be preferable to use the alternative approach in which the amount of nutrients/ energy in the test meal is estimated as unit amount per kg body weight (Cohn et al, 1988a(Cohn et al, , b, 1993Lopez-Miranda et al, 1997;Shishebor et al, 1999) or body surface area (Weintraub et al, 1988;Karpe et al, 1993). Although this may be considered a more valid approach because it takes account of greater blood volume in larger subjects, it should be considered that in adults the main variable influencing body weight is variation in fat mass.…”
Section: Meal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept behind this type of approach is that a large fat load will overwhelm the normal capacity of lipoprotein handling postprandially and thus, will reveal those subjects with reduced capacity (linked to disturbed metabolism and/or diet), whereas a smaller meal may be insufficient to challenge the metabolic capacity to its limit. Cohen et al (1988) 40-120 Weintraub et al (1988) 50 g/m 2 body surface area Cohn et al (1988aCohn et al ( , 1993 1 g/kg body weight Schneeman (1990) 43 Cara et al (1992) 70 Karpe et al (1993) 50 g/m 2 body surface area Dubois et al (1994a, b) 31/42, 45 Zampelas et al (1994) 40 Frayn et al (1994) 80 Murphy et al (1995) 20-80 Fielding et al (1996) 61 Lopez-Miranda et al (1997) 1 g/kg body weight Lovegrove et al (1997) 82 Roche and Gibney, 1997;Roche et al, 1998a, b 40 Dubois et al (1998 15-50 Couillard et al (1998) 60/m 2 Shishebor et al (1999) 0.5 g/kg body weight Guerci et al (2001) 80 Harbis et al (2001) 40 Dallongeville et al (2002) 70 Harbis et al (2004) 28-29…”
Section: Meal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fasting plasma concentrations of cholesterol and triglycerides in VLDL, LDL and HDL were determined by a combination of preparative ultracentrifugation, precipitation of apo B-containing lipoproteins and lipid analyses [17]. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins were subfractionated by cumulative density gradient ultracentrifugation [18]. Consecutive runs calculated to float Sf over 400, Sf 60±400 and Sf 20±60 particles were made and the Sf 12±20 fraction was recovered by slicing the tube after the Sf 20±60 lipoproteins had been aspirated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%