2020
DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions for Students in the Primary Grades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
134
4
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
25
134
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the systematic reviews and meta-analyses of well-designed studies show that alphabetic skills, word reading, and spelling are proven intervention targets for students who struggle to learn to read (Gersten, Newman-Gonchar, Haymond, & Dimino, 2017; Wanzek et al, 2018). These are malleable, foundational skills that are necessary but not sufficient for reading success.…”
Section: Mechanisms For Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from the systematic reviews and meta-analyses of well-designed studies show that alphabetic skills, word reading, and spelling are proven intervention targets for students who struggle to learn to read (Gersten, Newman-Gonchar, Haymond, & Dimino, 2017; Wanzek et al, 2018). These are malleable, foundational skills that are necessary but not sufficient for reading success.…”
Section: Mechanisms For Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a subsequent review of reading programs for at-risk first graders, Gersten, Newman-Gonchar, Haymond, and Dimino (2017) found seven additional studies that included a comprehension component. The comprehension component in these studies consisted of learning discrete comprehension skills, reading connected text, and answering questions.…”
Section: Comprehension Instruction In the Early Gradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborators on the outcome study (Gersten, Jayanthi, & Dimino, 2017) offer some explanations from observations of implementation that likely influenced the findings, including the fact that 60% of classrooms reported that students missed some of their reading instruction, Tier 2 reading interventions supplanted rather than supplemented Tier 1 instruction for over half of the students, and too many first-grade students received intervention (41% compared with 20% recommendation by experts). A different analysis by Gersten, Newman-Gonchar, Haymond, and Dimino (2017) documented that high-quality Tier 2 reading interventions delivered with fidelity significantly improved word reading, fluency, and comprehension for Grades 1 to 3. The authors concluded that “high fidelity of implementation” is needed for RTI to work.…”
Section: Research-to-practice Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%