2020
DOI: 10.3390/nano10030476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous Cobalt Ferrite Nanosystems Obtained by Surfactant-Assisted Hydrothermal Method: Tuning Morpho-structural and Magnetic Properties via pH-Variation

Abstract: A facile and cheap surfactant-assisted hydrothermal method was used to prepare mesoporous cobalt ferrite nanosystems with BET surface area up to 151 m 2 /g. These mesostructures with high BET surface areas and pore sizes are made from assemblies of nanoparticles (NPs) with average sizes between 7.8 and 9.6 nm depending on the initial pH conditions. The pH proved to be the key factor for controlling not only NP size, but also the phase purity and the porosity properties of the mesostructures. At pH values lower… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest value of saturation magnetization for this type of material was obtained on bulk (80.8 emu/g at room temperature and 93.9 emu/g at 5 K) [52]. The decrease of 13.9 emu/g of the saturation magnetization at room temperature compared to the one recorded at 5 K in bulk materials was attributed to the variation of the electronic populations on CoFe 2 O 4 orbitals with temperature [19]. For our samples, CF and TCF, the difference between M s recorded at 300 K and that at 5 K is smaller than in bulk, 5.08 and 6.83 emu/g, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Cobalt Ferrite Samplesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The highest value of saturation magnetization for this type of material was obtained on bulk (80.8 emu/g at room temperature and 93.9 emu/g at 5 K) [52]. The decrease of 13.9 emu/g of the saturation magnetization at room temperature compared to the one recorded at 5 K in bulk materials was attributed to the variation of the electronic populations on CoFe 2 O 4 orbitals with temperature [19]. For our samples, CF and TCF, the difference between M s recorded at 300 K and that at 5 K is smaller than in bulk, 5.08 and 6.83 emu/g, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Cobalt Ferrite Samplesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For our samples, CF and TCF, the difference between M s recorded at 300 K and that at 5 K is smaller than in bulk, 5.08 and 6.83 emu/g, respectively. This smaller decrease of M s for nanoparticles compared with the bulk could be explained by the thermal fluctuations of the magnetic moment in a single energy minimum when temperature increase [19]. At low temperature, when spin orientation thermal fluctuations are negligible, the difference between the M s of our samples and that of bulk materials can be explained by the presence of an outer layer belonging to the nanoparticles surface which has an insignificant contribution to M s [19].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Cobalt Ferrite Samplesmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, many of these methods used toxic organic reagents such as ethylene glycol, [ 18 ] polyethylene glycol, [ 19 ] and so forth, organic acids as capping agent (citric acid, [ 20 ] sulfonic acid, [ 21 ] nicotinic acid, [ 22 ] lauric acid, [ 23 ] etc. ), large amount of surfactants, [ 24 ] high temperature, [ 25 ] and so forth, that is why it suffered from drawbacks. We have chosen the cheap and simple coprecipitation route without using any expensive equipment and led to desired product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%