2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury measurement and control in a CO2-enriched flue gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, no clear bias in high CO 2 environments was noted. While other studies have suggested bias (Pavlish 2011) (Zhuang, et al 2011), difference in the amount of NaOH solution and the method of contact between the solution and gas stream may account for the apparent lack of bias found in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, no clear bias in high CO 2 environments was noted. While other studies have suggested bias (Pavlish 2011) (Zhuang, et al 2011), difference in the amount of NaOH solution and the method of contact between the solution and gas stream may account for the apparent lack of bias found in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The purpose of this task was to investigate the potential biases of Hg measurement techniques, dependent on the nature of the flue-gas composition: air vs. oxy. EERC has performed some experimentation showing that wet-chemical conditioning systems may bias mercury concentration measurements by scrubbing CO 2 from the flue gas stream (Pavlish 2011) (Zhuang, et al 2011). This bias has not been observed in the measurements performed by REI so far.…”
Section: Mercury Measurement Recalibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the advantage to avoid the CO 2 separation from flue gas, NO x emission can be reduced to less than one-third of that of combustion in air because not only of the reduction of thermal NO x (due to the air-nitrogen elimination) but also because of the reburning of recycled NO x with volatiles as well as reaction of recycled NO x with char [1,3,4]. On the other hand, the SO 2 concentration increases during oxycoal combustion with RFG [1,5] and gas purification by flue gas desulphurisation systems is mandatory because of the high risk of in-furnace corrosion and CO 2 transportation systems [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new oxy-combustion conditions may lead to certain changes with respect to conventional combustion conditions, which might involve modifications not only in the composition of the reactive gases (Normann et al, 2009;Liémans et al, 2011;Stanger and Wall, 2011;Ting et al, 2013), but also in the fate of the trace elements (Roy and Bhattacharya, 2014). Of the trace elements, mercury is the one of greatest concern because coal combustion is one of the major anthropogenic sources of mercury to the environment (Zhuang et al, 2011b;Roy et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%