Mental health outcomes at the end of the British involvement in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts: a cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundLittle is known about the prevalence of mental health outcomes in UK personnel at the end of the British involvement in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.AimsWe examined the prevalence of mental disorders and alcohol misuse, whether this differed between serving and ex-serving regular personnel and by deployment status.MethodThis is the third phase of a military cohort study (2014–2016; n = 8093). The sample was based on participants from previous phases (2004–2006 and 2007–2009) and a new randomly selected sample of those who had joined the UK armed forces since 2009.ResultsThe prevalence was 6.2% for probable post-traumatic stress disorder, 21.9% for common mental disorders and 10.0% for alcohol misuse. Deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan and a combat role during deployment were associated with significantly worse mental health outcomes and alcohol misuse in ex-serving regular personnel but not in currently serving regular personnel.ConclusionsThe findings highlight an increasing prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and a lowering prevalence of alcohol misuse compared with our previous findings and stresses the importance of continued surveillance during service and beyond.Declaration of interest:All authors are based at King's College London which, for the purpose of this study and other military-related studies, receives funding from the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD). S.A.M.S., M.J., L.H., D.P., S.M. and R.J.R. salaries were totally or partially paid by the UK MoD. The UK MoD provides support to the Academic Department of Military Mental Health, and the salaries of N.J., N.G. and N.T.F. are covered totally or partly by this contribution. D.Mu. is employed by Combat Stress, a national UK charity that provides clinical mental health services to veterans. D.MacM. is the lead consultant for an NHS Veteran Mental Health Service. N.G. is the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Lead for Military and Veterans’ Health, a trustee of Walking with the Wounded, and an independent director at the Forces in Mind Trust; however, he was not directed by these organisations in any way in relation to his contribution to this paper. N.J. is a full-time member of the armed forces seconded to King's College London. N.T.F. reports grants from the US Department of Defense and the UK MoD, is a trustee (unpaid) of The Warrior Programme and an independent advisor to the Independent Group Advising on the Release of Data (IGARD). S.W. is a trustee (unpaid) of Combat Stress and Honorary Civilian Consultant Advisor in Psychiatry for the British Army (unpaid). S.W. is affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King's College London in partnership with Public Health England, in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, the Department of Health, Public Health England or the UK MoD.

Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Attempts, and Self‐Harm in the UK Armed Forces

“…Mental health‐related stigmatization was not associated with SA; however, stigma reduction efforts are often a central feature of suicide reduction campaigns (Niederkrotenthaler, Reidenberg, Till, & Gould, ). The lack of association in our study notwithstanding, given that mental ill health was significantly associated with both SA and SH and recent studies have shown that around 50% of UK AF personnel with mental disorder symptoms do not seek help (Stevelink, Jones, Hull, et al., ), it remains important to ensure that those with mental disorder symptoms are assisted to navigate barriers to care and to engage with evidence‐based treatments.…”

“…Phase 2 incorporated existing cohort members, a new random sample of UK AF personnel at risk of operational deployment (the replenishment sample), and a further randomly selected sample of personnel who had undertaken deployment to Afghanistan (Fear et al., ). Phase 3 surveyed existing cohort members and a further randomly selected replenishment sample (Stevelink, Jones, Hull, et al., ). At each study phase, potential cohort participants were identified from military records as belonging to specific subgroups, for instance, regular and reserve forces, personnel who had deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, male or female gender, and not belonging to special forces.…”

“…(), and Stevelink, Jones, Hull, et al. (). In the telephone interview study component, using factors known to be associated with responding in UK military studies such as age, rank, and service background, response weights were generated to account for nonresponse; the weights represented the inverse probability of responding once sampled.…”

Exploring the Feasibility of Supporting UK Partners Living Alongside Veterans with PTSD: A Pilot Study of the Together Programme (TTP)

“…The impact of military conflict on mental health is well established, for instance several studies have demonstrated the higher prevalence rates of mental health difficulties such as anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance misuse among veterans compared to that of the general population [1] [2] [3] [4]. A recent study showed an increase in PTSD rates in the UK military from 4% to 6.2% between 2010 and 2018 [1]. When restricted to only veterans (in the UK defined as having completed one day of paid service) the prevalence rate was 9%.…”

Post‐traumatic stress disorder: diagnosis and management

“…9 Research also suggests that rates of PTSD are highest in veterans who had recently deployed in a combat role to Iraq or Afghanistan. 10 While anyone can develop PTSD following trauma exposure, incidence increases with trauma severity. Other risk factors can include: previous psychiatric disorder; subsequent life stress post-trauma; a history of childhood adversity; low educational attainment; appraisals of the work in operational theatre as being above an individual's trade or experience; and low unit/organisation morale or poor social support.…”