Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population

Abstract

Background The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on population mental health is of increasing global concern. We examine changes in adult mental health in the UK population before and during the lockdown. Methods In this secondary analysis of a national, longitudinal cohort study, households that took part in Waves 8 or 9 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) panel, including all members aged 16 or older in April, 2020, were invited to complete the COVID-19 web survey on April 23–30, 2020. Participants who were unable to make an informed decision as a result of incapacity, or who had unknown postal addresses or addresses abroad were excluded. Mental health was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Repeated cross-sectional analyses were done to examine temporal trends. Fixed-effects regression models were fitted to identify within-person change compared with preceding trends. Findings Waves 6–9 of the UKHLS had 53 351 participants. Eligible participants for the COVID-19 web survey were from households that took part in Waves 8 or 9, and 17 452 (41·2%) of 42 330 eligible people participated in the web survey. Population prevalence of clinically significant levels of mental distress rose from 18·9% (95% CI 17·8–20·0) in 2018–19 to 27·3% (26·3–28·2) in April, 2020, one month into UK lockdown. Mean GHQ-12 score also increased over this time, from 11·5 (95% CI 11·3–11·6) in 2018–19, to 12·6 (12·5–12·8) in April, 2020. This was 0·48 (95% CI 0·07–0·90) points higher than expected when accounting for previous upward trends between 2014 and 2018. Comparing GHQ-12 scores within individuals, adjusting for time trends and significant predictors of change, increases were greatest in 18–24-year-olds (2·69 points, 95% CI 1·89–3·48), 25–34-year-olds (1·57, 0·96–2·18), women (0·92, 0·50–1·35), and people living with young children (1·45, 0·79–2·12). People employed before the pandemic also averaged a notable increase in GHQ-12 score (0·63, 95% CI 0·20–1·06). Interpretation By late April, 2020, mental health in the UK had deteriorated compared with pre-COVID-19 trends. Policies emphasising the needs of women, young people, and those with preschool aged children are likely to play an important part in preventing future mental illness. Funding None.

Barriers and facilitators to mood and confidence in pregnancy and early parenthood during COVID-19 in the UK: A mixed-methods synthesis survey

“…This study found that COVID-19 and associated restrictions during the most restrictive phase of lockdown had a detrimental impact on the well-being of expectant parents and those in early parenthood, more specifically, a decrease in their mood and parenting confidence. This is consistent with recent findings of increased prenatal and postnatal anxiety, 17,18 as well as increased mental distress in the wider population 19 during COVID-19. Our study also identified barriers and facilitators to well-being during this period.…”

“…This is in line with recent research showing that parents with young children had higher levels of mental distress. 19 While there is evidence linking parenting confidence to children's later behaviour, 12 there is little research focusing on which factors contribute to the development of parenting confidence. 28 Our findings suggest that for first-time parents, not relying on childcare had the positive effect of increasing their confidence in parenting.…”

Health behaviors and mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population-based survey

“…Also, closures of schools and daycares massively increased childcare demands, and (working) mothers have largely taken over the job. Importantly, women are also more likely to experience mental health problems such as depression and anxiety (Jacobi et al, 2014) and thus are more vulnerable to poorer mental health as a consequence of COVID-19-related stressors (see Pierce et al, 2020 for such findings in the United Kingdom). Others strongly affected by policy measures are those whose employment is insecure, for example, because they are working fewer hours, have been furloughed, or have lost their job; such people experience particularly high stress due to financial insecurity, loss of routine, and social stigma (e.g., during the 2008-2013 financial crisis (Drydakis, 2015); but see also Recchi et al, 2020).…”

Short-term effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal ideation: A prospective cohort study

“…These factors may have adverse effects on public mental health. Indeed, studies in various countries show that the general population's mental health has worsened since the pre-pandemic period (Pierce et al, 2020;Salari et al, 2020). Because economic shocks and deteriorating mental health status can be major suicide risk factors, the number of suicides may rise during and after the pandemic (Gunnell et al, 2020;Reger et al, 2020).…”