Memory rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Memory rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis.

Neurocognitive and Self-efficacy Benefits of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…This is also despite everyday living skills being arguably more proximal to the CR training exercises compared to other functional outcomes (e.g., occupational status) as well as their close association with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia Kurtz, 2012). This study is, therefore, consistent with others that have failed to demonstrate generalization of gains from cognitive training to the real world in individuals with schizophrenia (Dickinson et al, 2010;Fisher et al, 2009;Gomar et al, 2015;Murthy et al, 2012) and other patient groups (das Nair, Martin, & Lincoln, 2016;van Heugten, Ponds, & Kessels, 2016).…”

Neurocognitive and Self-efficacy Benefits of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…This is also despite everyday living skills being arguably more proximal to the CR training exercises compared to other functional outcomes (e.g., occupational status) as well as their close association with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia Kurtz, 2012). This study is, therefore, consistent with others that have failed to demonstrate generalization of gains from cognitive training to the real world in individuals with schizophrenia (Dickinson et al, 2010;Fisher et al, 2009;Gomar et al, 2015;Murthy et al, 2012) and other patient groups (das Nair, Martin, & Lincoln, 2016;van Heugten, Ponds, & Kessels, 2016).…”

A group memory rehabilitation programme for people with traumatic brain injuries: the ReMemBrIn RCT

“…19 At a symposium on disorders of memory, Wilson 20 called for 'better evaluation of memory rehabilitation programmes' (p. e4-5). This is a conclusion that more recent systematic reviews of memory rehabilitation following TBI, 18 stroke 21 and multiple sclerosis 22 also reached. This conclusion has been attributed mainly to the dearth of high-quality RCTs, but may also reflect the lack of common outcomes measures that are responsive to the effects of memory rehabilitation.…”

Evaluating the effectiveness of compensatory memory interventions in adults with acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of memory and everyday outcomes.

“…The type and severity of brain injury also varied across trials. Thirteen out of the 22 trials looked at participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI; Berg et al, 1991; Bergquist et al, 2009; Chiaravalloti et al, 2016; das Nair et al, 2016; Freeman et al, 1992; Milders et al, 1998; O’Neil-Pirozzi et al, 2010; Potvin et al, 2011; Raskin et al, 2019; Ryan & Ruff, 1988; Schmitter-Edgecombe et al, 1995; Shum et al, 2011; Storzbach et al, 2017), five included participants with a history of stroke (Aben et al, 2013; Doornhein & De Haan, 1998; Fish et al, 2008; Miller & Radford, 2014; Withiel et al, 2019), and the remaining four studies utilized a mixed population with ABI. Furthermore, 10 out of 22 studies recruited participants with moderate–severe injury (TBI-only: Berg et al, 1991; Bergquist et al, 2009; Chiaravalloti et al, 2016; Milders et al, 1998; Potvin et al, 2011; Raskin et al, 2019; Ryan & Ruff, 1998; Schmitter-Edgecombe et al, 1995; Shum et al, 2011; Mixed sample: Thickpenny-Davis & Barker-Collo, 2007), one recruited only participants with mild severity (TBI-only: Storzbach et al, 2017), four included participants with brain injury of all severities (TBI-only: das Nair et al, 2019; O’Neil-Pirozzi et al, 2010; Mixed samples: Hildebrandt et al, 2006; Jennett & Lincoln, 1991), and the remaining seven studies did not specify the severity of injury.…”

Neurocognitive and Self-efficacy Benefits of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…This is also despite everyday living skills being arguably more proximal to the CR training exercises compared to other functional outcomes (e.g., occupational status) as well as their close association with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia Kurtz, 2012). This study is, therefore, consistent with others that have failed to demonstrate generalization of gains from cognitive training to the real world in individuals with schizophrenia (Dickinson et al, 2010;Fisher et al, 2009;Gomar et al, 2015;Murthy et al, 2012) and other patient groups (das Nair, Martin, & Lincoln, 2016;van Heugten, Ponds, & Kessels, 2016).…”

A group memory rehabilitation programme for people with traumatic brain injuries: the ReMemBrIn RCT

“…19 At a symposium on disorders of memory, Wilson 20 called for 'better evaluation of memory rehabilitation programmes' (p. e4-5). This is a conclusion that more recent systematic reviews of memory rehabilitation following TBI, 18 stroke 21 and multiple sclerosis 22 also reached. This conclusion has been attributed mainly to the dearth of high-quality RCTs, but may also reflect the lack of common outcomes measures that are responsive to the effects of memory rehabilitation.…”

Evaluating the effectiveness of compensatory memory interventions in adults with acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of memory and everyday outcomes.

“…The type and severity of brain injury also varied across trials. Thirteen out of the 22 trials looked at participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI; Berg et al, 1991; Bergquist et al, 2009; Chiaravalloti et al, 2016; das Nair et al, 2016; Freeman et al, 1992; Milders et al, 1998; O’Neil-Pirozzi et al, 2010; Potvin et al, 2011; Raskin et al, 2019; Ryan & Ruff, 1988; Schmitter-Edgecombe et al, 1995; Shum et al, 2011; Storzbach et al, 2017), five included participants with a history of stroke (Aben et al, 2013; Doornhein & De Haan, 1998; Fish et al, 2008; Miller & Radford, 2014; Withiel et al, 2019), and the remaining four studies utilized a mixed population with ABI. Furthermore, 10 out of 22 studies recruited participants with moderate–severe injury (TBI-only: Berg et al, 1991; Bergquist et al, 2009; Chiaravalloti et al, 2016; Milders et al, 1998; Potvin et al, 2011; Raskin et al, 2019; Ryan & Ruff, 1998; Schmitter-Edgecombe et al, 1995; Shum et al, 2011; Mixed sample: Thickpenny-Davis & Barker-Collo, 2007), one recruited only participants with mild severity (TBI-only: Storzbach et al, 2017), four included participants with brain injury of all severities (TBI-only: das Nair et al, 2019; O’Neil-Pirozzi et al, 2010; Mixed samples: Hildebrandt et al, 2006; Jennett & Lincoln, 1991), and the remaining seven studies did not specify the severity of injury.…”

Neurocognitive and Self-efficacy Benefits of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…This is also despite everyday living skills being arguably more proximal to the CR training exercises compared to other functional outcomes (e.g., occupational status) as well as their close association with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia Kurtz, 2012). This study is, therefore, consistent with others that have failed to demonstrate generalization of gains from cognitive training to the real world in individuals with schizophrenia (Dickinson et al, 2010;Fisher et al, 2009;Gomar et al, 2015;Murthy et al, 2012) and other patient groups (das Nair, Martin, & Lincoln, 2016;van Heugten, Ponds, & Kessels, 2016).…”

A group memory rehabilitation programme for people with traumatic brain injuries: the ReMemBrIn RCT

“…19 At a symposium on disorders of memory, Wilson 20 called for 'better evaluation of memory rehabilitation programmes' (p. e4-5). This is a conclusion that more recent systematic reviews of memory rehabilitation following TBI, 18 stroke 21 and multiple sclerosis 22 also reached. This conclusion has been attributed mainly to the dearth of high-quality RCTs, but may also reflect the lack of common outcomes measures that are responsive to the effects of memory rehabilitation.…”

Evaluating the effectiveness of compensatory memory interventions in adults with acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of memory and everyday outcomes.

“…The type and severity of brain injury also varied across trials. Thirteen out of the 22 trials looked at participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI; Berg et al, 1991; Bergquist et al, 2009; Chiaravalloti et al, 2016; das Nair et al, 2016; Freeman et al, 1992; Milders et al, 1998; O’Neil-Pirozzi et al, 2010; Potvin et al, 2011; Raskin et al, 2019; Ryan & Ruff, 1988; Schmitter-Edgecombe et al, 1995; Shum et al, 2011; Storzbach et al, 2017), five included participants with a history of stroke (Aben et al, 2013; Doornhein & De Haan, 1998; Fish et al, 2008; Miller & Radford, 2014; Withiel et al, 2019), and the remaining four studies utilized a mixed population with ABI. Furthermore, 10 out of 22 studies recruited participants with moderate–severe injury (TBI-only: Berg et al, 1991; Bergquist et al, 2009; Chiaravalloti et al, 2016; Milders et al, 1998; Potvin et al, 2011; Raskin et al, 2019; Ryan & Ruff, 1998; Schmitter-Edgecombe et al, 1995; Shum et al, 2011; Mixed sample: Thickpenny-Davis & Barker-Collo, 2007), one recruited only participants with mild severity (TBI-only: Storzbach et al, 2017), four included participants with brain injury of all severities (TBI-only: das Nair et al, 2019; O’Neil-Pirozzi et al, 2010; Mixed samples: Hildebrandt et al, 2006; Jennett & Lincoln, 1991), and the remaining seven studies did not specify the severity of injury.…”