Medir el impacto del trabajo sobre la salud : estudios longitudinales, si, pero cuáles ?

Coutrot, Thomas; Wolff, Loup

doi:10.4000/pistes.2211

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar studies resulting from the application of instruments, such as INSAT [25,26], SUMER [27], EVREST [28] and CTESLAC [29], focus on aspects related to working conditions. Other tools make it possible to calculate the epidemiological risk of each individual, such as the Framingham score [57] and the QRISK3 [58] calculator for estimating 10-year risk for myocardial infarction and stroke.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A number of instruments have been developed to assess WH with the main objective of improving working conditions and promoting health and well-being in the workplace [25]. Examples are Health and Work Survey (INSAT) [26], Medical surveillance of exposures to occupational risks (SUMER) [27], Evolution and Workplace Health Relations (EVREST) [28] and the Basic questionnaire and methodological criteria for Surveys on Working Conditions, Employment, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean (CTESLAC) [29]. In particular, the study by Yueng-Hsiang et al [30] is a very important contribution to the development and validation of questionnaires applied in the WH and safety fields.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and Validation of an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI)

Viterbo

Dinis

Costa³

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aimed to develop and validate an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI). The development stage comprised a group of 10 professionals, including physicians, nurses, nutritionists, dentists and physical educators, as well as a judges’ committee, composed by 19 recognized experts in the area of worker’s health (WH). For the validation of the IWHAI, the Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) was calculated, the factor analysis to the instrument was applied, and the Cronbach’s alpha (α) and the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. The IWHAI was structured in five dimensions, integrating 43 health indicators, on a scale of 0–4, totalling 215 sub-indices with closed response coding. The instrument was validated with a Kappa coefficient (KAPPA) (k), with excellent agreement for all attributes, i.e., k = 0.88 for applicability, k = 0.80 for clarity and k = 0.82 for relevance. p > 0.05 results reveal moderate to strong positive correlations between some variables, i.e., pests, vectors and air quality/drinking water quality (rs = 0.69). A total of 14 components of the factor analysis, explaining 62.6% of the data variance, were extracted. α value is considered moderate to high, α = 0.61, the ICC value also being considered moderate to high, with ICC = 0.61. The IWHAI is considered validated, constituting a technological innovation for an interdisciplinary approach in the field of WH, enabling the prevention and integral promotion of health.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and Validation of an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI)

Viterbo

Dinis

Costa³

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Medir el impacto del trabajo sobre la salud : estudios longitudinales, si, pero cuáles ?

Abstract: TrajectoireMesurer l'impact du travail sur la santé : du longitudinal, oui, mais lequel ?

Cited by 1 publication

References 2 publications

Development and Validation of an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI)

Development and Validation of an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About