2002
DOI: 10.1097/00007611-200295050-00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Malpractice and Respondeat Superior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 For Regan, individuals can be harmed either by physical or psychological suffering or by deprivation ''of those benefits that make possible or enlarge the sources of satisfaction in life''. 19 In contrast to utilitarian approaches, welfare is no longer focused solely on pleasure and pain: An animal can be harmed without knowing it if we make its life less contented than it could be. 20 In addition, unlike many other welfare theories, the animal rights approach is strictly egalitarian.…”
Section: Concepts Of Animal Welfare 161mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 For Regan, individuals can be harmed either by physical or psychological suffering or by deprivation ''of those benefits that make possible or enlarge the sources of satisfaction in life''. 19 In contrast to utilitarian approaches, welfare is no longer focused solely on pleasure and pain: An animal can be harmed without knowing it if we make its life less contented than it could be. 20 In addition, unlike many other welfare theories, the animal rights approach is strictly egalitarian.…”
Section: Concepts Of Animal Welfare 161mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he doctrine of respondeat superior, or "let the master answer," states that an employer or principal may be held legally responsible for wrongful acts of an employee or agent who is acting within the scope of their employment. 1,2 In medical practice, this doctrine can result in hospitals or supervising physicians being liable for negligence and other wrongful acts performed by their attending physicians and clinicians they supervise. 3 As a result, attending physicians may be held vicariously liable for the actions of the trainees they supervise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, if the physician or other professional is an employee (or similar agent) of the health care institution, that institution is generally responsible for the physician's negligence during the employment. 49 Even if the physician is not an employee (for example, an independent contractor providing care or using the hospital facilities), the health care facility may be liable for the physician's negligence. 50 Liability may occur, for example, if the health care facility was aware that the physician was engaged in careless practice or was otherwise a risk to patients but the facility did not take steps to avoid those risks.…”
Section: Institutional or Corporate Liability To Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%