2001
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-09-03271.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial Geniculate, Amygdalar and Cingulate Cortical Training-Induced Neuronal Activity during Discriminative Avoidance Learning in Rabbits with Auditory Cortical Lesions

Abstract: This study addressed the neural mediation of discriminative avoidance learning, wherein rabbits step in a wheel apparatus in response to an acoustic conditional stimulus, the CSϩ, to avoid a foot shock, and they learn to ignore a different stimulus, the CSϪ, not followed by foot shock. Previously, muscimolinduced inactivation of the amygdala in the first session of training prevented learning during the inactivation and permanently blocked the development of discriminative traininginduced neuronal activity (TI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 2, we describe the performance of 12 rats trained on an auditory-cognitive task, i.e., auditory-cued active avoidance. Performance on this task is impaired by lesions of auditory cortex (Delay and Rudolph, 1994; Duvel et al, 2001; Ohl et al, 1999), and enhanced by systemic administration of nicotine (Erickson, 1971; Sansone et al, 1994a; Sansone et al, 1994b; Sansone et al, 1991; Yilmaz et al, 1997). Finally, in Section 3, we present 18 F-nifene binding data for six rats—the three best-performing and three worst-performing animals from the cohort in Section 2—in order to correlate performance with binding in selected brain regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2, we describe the performance of 12 rats trained on an auditory-cognitive task, i.e., auditory-cued active avoidance. Performance on this task is impaired by lesions of auditory cortex (Delay and Rudolph, 1994; Duvel et al, 2001; Ohl et al, 1999), and enhanced by systemic administration of nicotine (Erickson, 1971; Sansone et al, 1994a; Sansone et al, 1994b; Sansone et al, 1991; Yilmaz et al, 1997). Finally, in Section 3, we present 18 F-nifene binding data for six rats—the three best-performing and three worst-performing animals from the cohort in Section 2—in order to correlate performance with binding in selected brain regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low route has limited capacity for stimulus discrimination. Fear conditioning studies that find support for the low route typically require only detection of the presence or absence of a stimulus (Duvel, Smith, Talk, & Gabriel, 2001;LeDoux et al, 1989;Shi & Davis, 2001). When the task requires discriminating one stimulus from another (e.g., CS+ = high freq.…”
Section: Assessing Three Hypotheses About Affect and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tone, CS− = low freq. tone), then cortical analysis appears to be necessary (Butler, Diamond, & Neff, 1957;Duvel et al, 2001;Komura et al, 2001;McCabe, McEchron, Green, & Schneiderman, 1993;Nicholson & Freeman, 2000;Thompson, 1962).…”
Section: Assessing Three Hypotheses About Affect and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MGv and primary CT pathway are believed to carry fast, sensory specific inputs and peripheral tonotopic maps to the AI [114] . The MGm is found to be involved in neuronal plasticity during auditory fear conditioning [115][116][117][118] . Learning in a fear condition is possibly associated with an elevated alertness of the AC and amygdala, where the MGm also sends projections.…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%