Media Representations of Sexual Abuse Risks

Abstract

What are the risks associated with child sexual abuse? Who is at risk? From whom? For professionals working in the field of child abuse, the main answers to such questions are straightforward. There is a broad consensus that children are at risk from adults (and young people), often from men (and sometimes women) that they know. Fathers, step‐fathers, uncles and brothers are often implicated. This is not, however, the focus of news coverage. Abductions, paedophile rings and abuse in children's homes attract intermittent but occasionally intense media attention. In contrast, sexual abuse of children within their own families is rarely front page news—except, that is, where the accusations are contested. Almost as soon as the existence of widespread abuse within ‘ordinary’ homes became public knowledge, this was over‐shadowed by a series of high‐profiled ‘scandals’, such as Cleveland, Rochdale and Orkney. The focus turned to questions of misdiagnosis, inappropriate intervention and the supposed coaching of children to make false accusations. More recently ‘false memory syndrome’ has hit the headlines suggesting that some adults' accounts of abuse can also be discredited. The news coverage often gives the impression that the main risks are not tochildren, but to parents, particularly fathers. How has this come to be the focus of public debate? Why is it that these risks have proved so much more ‘newsworthy’? This paper examines the media profile of the risks associated with sexual abuse and draws on interviews with journalists to seek to explain the shape of the coverage.

Criminal Visions

“……”

Child Maltreatment in the Media: Analyses of Media Coverage and Reader Comments on Child Maltreatment in Israel

“…In addition, the current study strengthens previous studies, which have indicated that the media tends to cover child maltreatment incidents in ways that emphasise dominant social stereotypes. For example, the coverage gives over‐representation to more extreme and bizarre incidents of maltreatment (McDevitt, ), and to cases in which the abuser is a stranger (Atmore, ; Cheit, ; Hesketh and Lynch, ; Kitzinger, ; Kitzinger and Skidmore, ) or someone outside the family (Mejia et al, ). These representations are not consistent with systematic reviews of the literature on child maltreatment.…”

The ‘social tsunami’: Media coverage of child abuse in Malaysia’s English-language newspapers in 2010

“…In addition, by blaming 'strangers' for child abuse (or in extreme cases the pathology of individual parents) no further examination is required of the cultural, political and ethical systems of the broader society and how they are implicated. Child welfare professionals and academics have advised the media internationally to report on the underlying causes of child abuse and neglect (Kitzinger, 1996) and these recommendations are relevant to Malaysia.…”