2010
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00047-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms Responsible for a ΦX174 Mutant's Ability To InfectEscherichia coliby Phosphorylation

Abstract: The ability for a virus to expand its host range is dependent upon a successful mode of viral entry. As such, the host range of the well-studied ΦX174 bacteriophage is dictated by the presence of a particular lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the bacterial surface. The mutant ΦX174 strain JACS-K, unlike its ancestor, is capable of infecting both its native host Escherichia coli C and E. coli K-12, which does not have the necessary LPS. The conversion of an alanine to a very reactive threonine on its virion surface w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5, dark gray). Like the nullifying mutation described in this study, other host range-affecting mutations map to this region (26,55).…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5, dark gray). Like the nullifying mutation described in this study, other host range-affecting mutations map to this region (26,55).…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Primarily residing within the coat F-spike G protein interface, they are more easily visualized when a spike complex is removed (right image). Mutations identified in X174 studies (26,55) are depicted in cyan. The residues of the conserved six-carbon sugar binding site are highlighted in purple (31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) and yet differ at only 11 synonymous and 1 nonsynonymous substitutions across their 6.5 kb genomes (Supporting Information Table S3). Single non‐synonymous substitutions are known to cause differences in host range, as previously observed in ssDNA phage phiX174, dsRNA phage phi6 and dsDNA phage ϕΕΦ24Χ (Cox and Putonti, ; Uchiyama et al ., ; Ford et al ., ). Here the non‐synonymous substitution belongs to a protein located in the phage particle and thus, presumed structural (Holmfeldt et al ., ), though its specific function is still unknown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, the difference in EOI could not be connected with sequence mutations in the phages' genomes. While difference in infection driven by altered phage entry (e.g., Baranowski et al ., ; Cox and Putonti, ; Uchiyama et al ., ; Ford et al ., ) or CRISPR system (Barrangou et al ., ) function is explained by nucleotide substitutions, this is not always the case for phages circumventing host restriction‐modification systems (Krüger and Bickle, ). We therefore hypothesized that the difference in EOI seen between the passaged and ancestral phages could be due to differences in DNA modification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%