2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Zr surface corrosion determined via molecular dynamics simulations with charge-optimized many-body (COMB) potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next scale up from DFT is Molecular Dynamics (MD), which while still nanoscale, allows thousands of atoms to be simulated. There have been very few studies done on Zr hydrides through MD because there are not currently very good interatomic potentials for the ZreH system; Noordhoek et al recently made one that works for hydrides [77], others made for the ZreH system do not work as well [78e80]. Zhu phases [81].…”
Section: Study Of Zreh System By Atomistic Modeling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next scale up from DFT is Molecular Dynamics (MD), which while still nanoscale, allows thousands of atoms to be simulated. There have been very few studies done on Zr hydrides through MD because there are not currently very good interatomic potentials for the ZreH system; Noordhoek et al recently made one that works for hydrides [77], others made for the ZreH system do not work as well [78e80]. Zhu phases [81].…”
Section: Study Of Zreh System By Atomistic Modeling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the COMB formalism can also include Zr-ZrO 2 -ZrH 2 system, which is presented in Ref. [28].…”
Section: Interatomic Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, the simulation and calculation results show that the addition of Zr will significantly increase the surface energy by approximately 20% in (1 0 0) surface, 10% in (1 1 0) surface and 15% in (1 1 1) surface with the ZrO 2 contents increasing from 0 to 12.5 mol%, respectively. This may be explained by the fact that the surface energy of the ZrO 2 crystal is higher than UO 2 crystal [56]. Therefore, the surface energies of (U 1−y Zr y )O 2 will increase as the doping level increases.…”
Section: The Effects Of Zr Doping On Surface Energies Of Uomentioning
confidence: 99%